Jump to content

Admin and censorship - pls read last atticus threads


Atticus

Recommended Posts

I agree with Atticus here. He was just pointing out that the Actress was advertising football but then had the sound down.. but it seems that because the post was 'negative' about the Actress the post was locked and he was told to add to a very old thread about the actress


but


there are many threads about Franklins, The Victoria Inn


seems a little inconsistent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because you seem to think that Admin is in some way censoring you, rather than simply keeping the place tidy by moving your threads into the correct sections.


And you've started a second thread about being censored in the space of, what, 3 minutes?


Persecution complex?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm annoyed because I wanted to edit my post due to it sounding a bit inflammatory without asking the details. Were there many people watching Atticus? Did you ask why the sound was down? I do definitely think if pubs are advertising that they're showing the footie, then it does seem absurd that they wouldn't have the sound up. No one wants to watch footie with the sound down!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think I've been perfectly reasonable throughout

> this, you decide.


Just read the locked thread and I agree with you. It's not a general comment, it's specific and I think it deserves its own thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saila Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with Atticus here. He was just pointing

> out that the Actress was advertising football but

> then had the sound down.. but it seems that

> because the post was 'negative' about the Actress

> the post was locked and he was told to add to a

> very old thread about the actress

>

> but

>

> there are many threads about Franklins, The

> Victoria Inn

>

> seems a little inconsistent


In Admins defence I'd say most if not all of what you claim here is inaccurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atticus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I've been perfectly reasonable

> throughout

> > this, you decide.

>

> Just read the locked thread and I agree with you.

> It's not a general comment, it's specific and I

> think it deserves its own thread.


So every establishment in the area is entitled to a thread about every aspect of its services? The place would become a mess. If the owner of the pub can't be bothered to respond to the query as to why the sound is down it's a poor reflection on him. It still doesn't need another thread though as he appears to be quite happy to write on the forum on the existing threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Narnia, i would guess the 'owner' is probably busy doing more fulfilling things.

A bit unfair to bash them - 'can't be bothered/ poor reflection'


As regards you other point re the relevance of the thread.

I guess we just have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You misunderstood my point Pearson or I didn't word it very well. I wasn't bashing the owner at all as he posts here quite regularly on two ongoing threads. I would expect him to reply if a complaint was posted on either of those but would hardly expect him to trawl through countless threads just looking for others relating to his pub.


I think the point is very relevant but as I've said it's more likely to get a response from the owner if it the post was written on one of the existing threads. As for censorship being involved, I thing that's rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sean, beautifully brutal but inconcise.

Have you decided that you don't quite care for my use of the word censorship? Perhaps then, that was a tad harsh.

Or, were you simply offended that I dared to speak out against EDF Admin fav 'The Actress'?

If the latter, then a consice explanation as to why 'The Actress' (in all its praising glory)thread was allowed 'lounge' status for weeks, as opposed to my critique of said pub, which, survived for less than a pitiful two hours, is justified.


Politely awaiting your defensive (and as read before) aggresive return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Available from Monday April 8th 2024, 2on2Walkies take pride in doggie care and only walk 2 furry friends at a time. I make sure that they get plenty of doggie interaction and socialisation in the park as well as making friends. Back home happy and tired I always check that the water bowl has fresh water and always make sure the doggie is left comfortable before I leave. I'm fully insured and have a couple of slots available for local walks to either Peckham Rye Park or Dulwich Park.  Thank you!  
    • Why would they only send them recorded delivery? I used the signed for option yesterday.
    • > however I know I will have to prove it and provide a receipt,  both I can't provide. So what leads you to say that the dustmen have done damage to it? 
    • Prayed in aid?!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...