Jump to content

Stirring up racial hatred


sheilarose

Recommended Posts

Dear Admin


(I have tried e-mailing you privately, but I don't have Outlook installed and can't seem to do it.)


I see that you have removed some offensive posts from the Lounge. I was going to copy some of them and report the poster to the police for the offence outlined below. I think perhaps that you should consider doing so yourselves.



Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006


2006 CHAPTER 1


An Act to make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds.

[16th February 2006]


Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:?.

1Hatred against persons on religious grounds.


The Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64) is amended in accordance with the Schedule to this Act, which creates offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on religious grounds.



(1)This Act may be cited as the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006. .

(2)This Act comes into force on such day as the Secretary of State may appoint by order made by statutory instrument. .

(3)An order under subsection (2) may make? .

(a)such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision, or .

(b)such transitory, transitional or saving provision, .

as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in connection with the coming into force of this Act.

(4)This Act extends to England and Wales only. .


Annotations:



Section 1

SCHEDULEHatred against persons on religious grounds

.


In the Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64), after Part 3 insert?


?Part 3A Hatred against persons on religious grounds


Meaning of ?religious hatred?


29AMeaning of ?religious hatred?.


In this Part ?religious hatred? means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.


Acts intended to stir up religious hatred


29BUse of words or behaviour or display of written material.


(1)A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. .

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the written material is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and are not heard or seen except by other persons in that or another dwelling. .

(3)A constable may arrest without warrant anyone he reasonably suspects is committing an offence under this section. .

(4)In proceedings for an offence under this section it is a defence for the accused to prove that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the written material displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling. .

(5)This section does not apply to words or behaviour used, or written material displayed, solely for the purpose of being included in a programme service. .

29CPublishing or distributing written material.


(1)A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (my emphasis)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Malumbu, by that measure are police efforts to cut down on anti-social driving by issuing tickets and fines a token effort as well? Surely punitive measures for cyclists breaking the rules will encourage them not to break the rules again? A bit like when you got stopped and taken into the cab of an HGV. The police are currently using that tactic to show those who break the rules cycling that it might lead them to being hit by a lorry due to the driver's having limited vision - the cycling equivalent of a speed awareness course for drivers.    When they stopped you was it because you had broken a rule or was it just more of an education programme and they asked you to take a look and did it change your cycling behaviour in any way? As I said previously there are those who break the rules on cycling out of ignorance (and those out of arrogance) and I am sure they are using HGVs to educate those in the ignorance category and then hitting those in the arrogance category with the PCNs.    
    • Good that PETA is on it but can we add our voices to the fight against this horrible practice? I’m still shocked! A petition maybe? Happy to raise to the RSPCA but don’t want to duplicate efforts. I’ve signed campaigns from RSPCA before which sends it directly to your councillor
    • Yes, I'm aware of that. I believe the brood was five to begin with. However they are almost adult size now so not the prey of rats any longer. 
    • Happy to recommend Greg. Lovely guy and a really hard worker, high standard of work, clean and tidy too. Greg sorted out a tricky water tank problem in a tight space in a loft, staying late into the evening to get the correct parts and fix the problem. Thanks Greg!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...