Jump to content

Homewrecker

unlurked

By unlurked
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

unlurked

unlurked

Posted
Posted
Has anyone else had a A4 'letter' through their door today containing pics, and name and address of a woman that has allegedly had an affair with a married man and broken up the home? And it's church related to boot. What fun.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the insinuation that its the woman's fault for 'breaking up the home'. Nothing to do with a

> married man cheating on his wife then?

>

> *rolls eyes*


To be fair, it's usually the 'other party' that gets such blame, regardless of gender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unlurked

unlurked

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I can't be the only one to get this through my door surely, unless no one on here lives in ED anymore and have all moved to Seaford (zzz). The letter is penned by a friend of the victim. There are two pics of the "homewrecker". A name and address on East Dulwich Grove is given for the homewrecker along with a work place-Dulwich Hamlett FC. The home wrecker is described as a "religeous church woman". The home wrecker had a thing with a married man ("don't worry he has not got away with it"). "its women like this that have given men too many options to lie . . .". ". .and women like this give the church a bad name". (underlined). Then there is a request for "women and those men that agree this is not acceptable behaviour and still believe in the sanctity of . . .marriage please help me humilitate her the way she has my friend and her children". Oh Lordy, I must go to church, and Hamlet FC more often!

Edited to add that after looking at the pics of the homewrecker- I wouldn't!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Millhaven

Millhaven

Posted
Posted

Dopamine1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it is your civic duty to scan and post the

> full letter and photo.


Haha! There is no way the forum moderator is going to let that happen. Not after the EDT shit on the floor scandal.


Shame though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Edited to add that after looking at the pics of

> the homewrecker- I wouldn't!



Haha, made me chuckle.



> please help me humilitate her the way

> she has my friend and her children".



How very Christian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huggers

Huggers

Posted
Posted
This 'friend' is probably the husband. Or even a stalker. It sounds thoroughly nasty and controlling to me- someone naming and making vulnerable a person to complete strangers. I'd take something like that straight to the police.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
speedbird

speedbird

Posted
Posted

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This 'friend' is probably the husband. Or even a

> stalker. It sounds thoroughly nasty and

> controlling to me- someone naming and making

> vulnerable a person to complete strangers. I'd

> take something like that straight to the police.



Erm... I wouldn't, I would scan and post on here and let us all take a vote! Go on, you know you want to...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This 'friend' is probably the husband.


The husband, Huggers?? Shags this women, leaves with the kids and then send out a mailer?? Seems unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dougal Mulldoon

Dougal Mulldoon

Posted
Posted

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the insinuation that its the woman's fault

> for 'breaking up the home'. Nothing to do with a

> married man cheating on his wife then?

>

> *rolls eyes*


Numbers, do you always have to take the lesbian/feminist view of everything????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • Sue
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By Sue · Posted

      If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • McMurphy
      Charter East Dulwich school

      By McMurphy · Posted

      interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...