Jump to content

Old stuff good, new shiny stuff bad


MrBen

Recommended Posts

It seemed that just after the 2008 recession hit, we entered "austerity", money was evil, bankers were evil, new shiny things were out and we went back to basics vintage stuff came in. The hipster movement in particular fetishises "vintage" and stuff with "provenance". I like good quality stuff too. But just because it's old doesn't mean its good. And vice versa.


When will new shiny stuff become fashionable again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hipsters are creative free and have no originality, so are rapacious & freely plundering other peoples cultural cupboards to attempt to add weight to their futile hedonistic meandering.like tapeworm, but with less personality.


Bankers are always evil blates. apart from the 85% who work in admin & support office jobs obvs.


Shiny stuff goes in stages - it is being shunned at present, cos the proles have access to cheap cash to sponk on shiny goods, so the cultural elite redefine what is desirable due it is percieved rarity - with this perception being somthing only the truly well bred can really appreciate. Once rates rack up to 8% and the unwashed masses really begin to feel the pinch (like they are not already), then shiny beccomes attractive again.


lolz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha- agree about the phones. I still use a blackberry and people look at me with mouths agape



Also, vintage has been popular for way longer than 2008. 15 years ago when I was at uni Urban Outfitters were already doing faux vintage t-shirts and pastiche vintage furniture so it was already a mass market look in NY back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad that "Bling" died. Stupid people wearing price labels on clothes, and the rest


"Faux and you Knaux it" block housing bling prevails


Proper knowing knock off tho


Take a look down Bond Street now, i't gag inducing Russian "we can out bling anybody"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

clothes retailer from the 80s that imported containerloads of used american clothing from landfill site, washed it and sold it to disaffected british youth, buzzing from watching too much happy days and little house on the prairie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big difference in the last few years is the words that people have come up with to make buying second-hand stuff sound like an ideologically based lifestyle choice that makes you superior to other people. The one that makes the hairs stand up on the back of my neck is 'upcycle' - second-hand but better because tarted up and no longer being used for its original purpose.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flip had a huge store in Edinburgh. And they went bust.


Up cycling? Better than hurling it in landfill. Quality lasts. A good example? You can buy a distressed chest of drawers from say Loaf or Made.com for ?600. It will look the part but is made overseas and made of plywood. OR you can buy a decent dovetailed Georgian chest of drawers at auction for not much more. In 10 years time one will be in the skip. The other can be resold for same or more than what you paid for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree-- there is a lot of great furniture that has stood the test of time made of beautiful hardwood that you can pick up for the same price as items made of softwoods in a similar style in high street retailers.


Buy what you like of course- I am not a huge fan of most Victorian furniture so wouldn't take most things if they were free but I do love Georgian (specifically Regency peices).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that's true. Also, you can always paint it if its not something very rare or special to make it feel more up to date.


Personally, I love rosewood and have a number mid-century rosewood items. The trick is not to have too much dark furniture in any single room as in a small Victorian terrace it can very quickly start to feel heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same subject. Back about 1995 - 2002 new futuristic shiny things were good. Worst example was those horrendous early gastro pub makeovers. They'd take down he Lions Head heraldry and replace the signage with horrific space age fonts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...