Jump to content

Life insurance


Melinda T

Recommended Posts

If you have people depending on your income - e.g. if you have a joint mortgage or dependent children, personally I would say it's a bit irresponsible not to have it.


However, if you are employed it's worth confirming you don't have it already through work as many companies give it as part of the standard contract. Often when provided, it's 4 x salary, which would pay off most mortgages, albeit probably not leave enough money if leaving young children behind. Although then some pension schemes will pay a pension to widow(ers) or dependents, which could be enough anyway.


I do have a mortgage but don't have anyone financially dependent on me, so I don't buy any life insurance - as it happens my employer provides enough my parents will be nicely provided for in the unlikely event I die before them. I think years ago some banks / building societies insisted you had to have life cover before accepting you for a mortgage - but am pretty sure that was stopped when they kept selling their own over-priced products to customers.


These days it's actually pretty cheap to cover yourself for the risk of death up to the age most people would have paid a mortgage off as the probability of young death still isn't that high despite all the stories about the obesity epidemic and impact on life expectancy. Worth shopping around for though - not everyone offers that competitive rates and just buying from your bank could prove unnecessarily expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A quick Google found this, amongst other things: "Social impact models are frameworks or approaches that guide how organizations or initiatives address social or environmental problems."
    • "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck then it must be a duck" comes to mind Unfortunately, a large number of cyclists do exhibit selfish amd anti social behaviour which, regardless of how many good cyclists there are, is seen as the norm.  It's a bit like one car driver jumping a red light and all car drivers getting tarred by the same brush. Perception is the issue and if cyclists all obeyed the rules, everyone would be less anti them but unfortunately that isn't the case 🤔
    • Crikey. How did you know it was Immigration Enforcement? 
    • Saying cyclists are the most antisocial people in London isn't helpful.  Nor is the Standard referring to cyclists as lycra clad louts  Yes we can have an adult conversation.  But emotive knee jerk nonsense is not going to achieve this and just plays into the hands of those wanting a manufactured culture war 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...