Jump to content

Zig Zag lines??


apbremer

Recommended Posts

I know not strictly ED.

For many years one could park happily and safely in the large layby just South of the Old College Gate of Dulwich Park. I cannot recall when zig zag lines were recently(?)installed but now parking tickets are seemingly distributed like the leaves of Autumn. The lines are a complete anomaly as they have no effect whatever on the safety issues of the nearby zebra crossing. In fact, why are zig zags ever installed AFTER crossings anyway~seems pointless?

Have any wicked parking criminals appealed successfully?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen a crossing without them? They've been around since the 1960s.


They're there to improve visibility at crossings - otherwise you'd be peering out from behind parked cars and oncoming cars would have trouble seeing you.


Not allowed to park on them...suprisingly I very rarely see vehicles ignoring that rule.


Consider yourself lucky as Police can issue 3 penalty points and ?100 fine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Has anyone taken it up with Southwark Council or the Counsellors/MPs ? I saw more tickets being distributed today.


This appears to be one of Southwak councils dirty little money making machines. They should make it much more obvious as they know countless people park there, it is really dishonest and underhand of them just to keep fining people.


There is no good reason why there are zig zag lines in this apparent parking area. It is all very unattractive Southwark!


I am going to complain, please do too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me that looks like a layby with no parking restrictions. What is painted on the highway has nothing to do with it. Southwark would have to have specific and clearly dispalyed parking restrictions in place for the layby itself imo. There's definitely a case here for a challenge I think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are Southwark saying that the zigzags in the middle of the road mean that the parking to the side is prohibited? In that case, you definitely have grounds for a challenge, as the marking are not, as I read it, in line with the legislation.


http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/schedule/4/made


I would say the lines would have to be as per diagram 3 or 6, depending on how you view that central reservation. In either case, there seems to be a requirement for lines at the edge of the carriageway, which that photos suggest none exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was fined for parking here a couple of momths ago. I have parked there for years and didn't relate the new lines to the crossing at all. My car back wheels were not on the zog zag. I didnt challenge it and paid up- but i didnt get any points either which you would usually gey fromparking on a crossing. So i think a money making machine rather than a visibility issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just drafted complain below based on what is said above

If you have a second, do copy and send one as well !!!!!



To [email protected] and cc Dulwich Community counsellor


Work: [email protected]


Dear Council,


On multiple occasions I have noticed parking tickets being handed to unfortunate drivers who parked in the large layby just South of the Old College Gate of Dulwich Park. Finally I have decided to complain about this Southwark money making trick and have support of many drivers.


Whilst the layby looks like an apparent parking bay and is not part of the highway, there are in fact zig zag lines on it which are not noticeable and no other signs about parking restrictions.


The zig zag lines have been installed only a few years ago and are a complete anomaly as have no effect on the safety issues of the nearby zebra crossing to Dulwich Picture Gallery in this quiet street with little traffic.


Southwark would either have to have specific and clearly displayed parking restrictions in place for the layby itself, or remove the zig zag lines and stop fining unsuspecting drivers some but not all of who do challenge the parking tickets on the grounds of unclear markings not entire in line with the regulations http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/schedule/4/made.


Kind regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz, it is s good suggestion


Yet, it appears everyone know what to do but nobody takes action


I am not looking for advice but for support by action


I happen to have contacts of Peckham Peculiar so forwarded the complain to

[email protected]


If you can get in touch with other local papers that would be much appreciated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An update - received an acknowledgement from Southwark that my complaint was reviewed and they are looking into it


Also Peckham Peculuar's co-editor responded:


Hi


Many thanks for this - sounds like a great story for the Dulwich paper! We will be in touch soon.


Best wishes,


Kate


_


Kate White

Co-editor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they are in stage one of dealing with my complaint. If I have paid and other challenges have won, I think I should get my money back! Specially as, if I had known I wasn't allowed to park there, there were plenty of other parking choices at the time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Did these tickets start appearing when Southwark needed money when Government grants were reduced.


As far back as I can remember people always parked there and there were never any accidents.


Is it people people are more stupid than in the past and cannot see further than their phones or coffee cups so Southwark has to take action on their behalf to safeguard them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seagal78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is a useless response I just received from

> Southwark technical support parking officer Sophie

> Clift.

>

> I forwarded to Dulwich Diverter and they will

> follow up on it next week.



I received exact same response this morning Seagal.can I have the link to Dulwich Diverter so I can forward mine too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Zig Zag lines indicate NO PARKING, then what are those bays for exactly?


If there's an issue with safety then fill the bays in, stop the issue at source


Even if Southwark have overlooked this, maybe they could give it the once over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My son’s primary school hatched duck eggs, probably under this scheme around 12 years ago.  We were all very upset to hear that 2 of the (5 year old) boys had knocked the incubator over & all eggs smashed.   feeling a lot less sad about that now!  
    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...