Jump to content

Sky signal blocked by scaffold - please vote on course of action you would take...


BlueOrchid

Recommended Posts

If you put up a large scaffold around your house and your neighbour told you it blocked their sky signal would you:


a) apologize and offer to pay for an engineer to fix their signal

b) ignore them

c) deny that your scaffold was the cause


Please vote now - I really want to know what most people would do


Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

go with a).


It's the decent thing to do, they may have a legal claim against you if you have caused the problem and they could also cause trouble for your redevelopment.


The dish may just need a slight height adjustment to solve the issue but do shop around for engineers as they can vary in price/quality.


B) and c) probably a bit tricky to run now you've asked the question on a public forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this some kind of passive agressive thing? You won't ask them for the money outright but you are hoping that they will see it on the forum and somehow be "shamed" into offering you the money?


If you really wAnt to get your money back, then you should just ask them directly. Otherwise probably best to just let it go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

d) This is a big city and this kind of thing happens all over said city (Google it) and it's only temporary after all and an inconvenience, I know, but if we had blocked light into a window and you had paid to have a series of mirrors rigged to get back that light I don't think you'd expect us to pay for it - you'd probably just moan and put up with it and wait for the scaff to come down and normality to be resumesd - like thousands of Londoners have done with scaffolding (for many may reaons) in the past and like they will do in the future. It IS a pain but really - that's life in town, kid.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is definitely something you should make a big deal over.


I mean it's not as if you have to live next door to each other; see each other every day; hear each other over the fence / through the wall all the time .. or possibly have other neighbour-related issues that might need joint co-operation in the future which will in due course be influenced by you seething over not being able to watch Eggheads - so yes - it's absolutely vital for your own wellbeing and future happiness that you escalate this situation as early as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> d) This is a big city and this kind of thing

> happens all over said city (Google it) and it's

> only temporary after all and an inconvenience, I

> know, but if we had blocked light into a window

> and you had paid to have a series of mirrors

> rigged to get back that light I don't think you'd

> expect us to pay for it - you'd probably just moan

> and put up with it and wait for the scaff to come

> down and normality to be resumesd - like thousands

> of Londoners have done with scaffolding (for many

> may reaons) in the past and like they will do in

> the future. It IS a pain but really - that's life

> in town, kid.


But it's SKY - WWE, Footie.


A man cannot live by Netflix alone :)


I'd be like the painting of The SCREAM


probably (a) but I'm too nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...