Jump to content

Petition for a new progressive alliance


WorkingMummy

Recommended Posts

signed and shared. The wording is:


'These are troubling times.


Our economy is in chaos. Our politics is broken. The Tories want to set the terms of our exit from the European Union.


This petition calls on politicians from the Labour Party, the Green Party, SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Liberal Democrats and other progressive parties to immediately begin talks about building an alliance ahead of the next election.


Despite what the Tories are now saying an Autumn election is likely. Progressives need to be ready for that.


We the undersigned urge that party leaders begin talks on a progressive alliance, which includes a commitment to proportional representation and an aim of preventing the formation of a Tory-UKIP-DUP government that would seek to enact an ultra-right Brexit.'


I liked it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A petition? Really? What is that going to achieve?


Wouldn't it be easier just for someone in the Greens to pick up the phone and ring the other party leaders? What exactly is the point of a petition? "Oooh and we have a few 10's of thousand people who have signed a petition, so you have to accept our offer".


On the other hand, it's probably like the useless Amnesty petitions, which are a dishonest excuse to increase their mailing list. Expect a lot of spam and money requests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure you're right Loz that the Greens will use the contact details gathered for their own publicity purposes. I think it would be a bit silly of them not to.


However I do see a point to a petition.


If I was in their shoes and picking up that phone I would want to be able to say that I had x thousand people supporting my initiative. It would help with the conversation, don't you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Despite what the Tories are now saying an Autumn election is likely. Progressives need to be ready for that."


Is someone able to clarify why an Autumn election is likely? Whoever wins the Tory leadership, the party has a majority and will not call a general election unless they lose a vote of no confidence. The idea of a progressive alliance is interesting but will not happen as a result of a petition.


PS That Andrea is yet another lightweight, Tory fantasist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - just read the small print at the bottom...


The Green Party may use the information you?ve given to contact you. By providing your data to us, you are consenting to us making contact with you in the future by email. You can always opt out of communications at any time by contacting us.


Personally, I think petitions like this are more than just a little devious. Especially as you are not given a check box to immediately opt-out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I signed the petition last week, and I have not been pestered with emails or post.


I take your point about ?really petitions. But I believe that grass roots led action is long overdue and it's not like time spent in chat rooms is going to solve anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be daft.

Democracy is no excuse for lunacy or abrogation of responsibility.

Democracy would bring back hanging if given the choice.

Democracy is mob rule, at its most extreme.

And the Tories had way less than 50% of the actual vote at the last GE.

They have a mandate to leave.

They have no mandate at all as to what leave means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"They have no mandate at all as to what leave means."


Ah, silly me. I thought 'leave' meant to leave!


I should have read the ballot paper as asking do you want to (1) stay; or (2) leave (whatever that means - we don't know)!


"Democracy is mob rule, at its most extreme." - Oh, well you'll forgive me if I don't take your opinion too seriously then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'd be theoretically supportive of a Lab/LibDem/SNP (hell even the bloody Greens) coalition in government, on a shared manifesto point of reversing Brexit, we need to remember that we're talking about politicians. With the amount of back-stabbing, bickering and scheming that goes on internally within a party, can you imagine FOUR of them cooperating in government?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the real problem is that, despite the wishful thinking, there won't be a coalition of significant parties standing on a platform of reversing Brexit nor would such a coalition win an election.


Most Tories and many in Labour know that's it now, so can't see Labour in such a coalition without a split

UKIP (in Labour heartlands) and Tories (in their strongholds/marginals) would hoover up votes against a 'get back in' campaign EVEN if Labour ran on it - (see above: they wont)


It's finsihed.



People need a reality check, it's done - now we may get something reasonably near what we were in terms of trade/movement etc (possibly); but we are propa out of what we were in terms of politics/membership

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's vital to acknowledge that this is a time of change in many areas of politics.


And while no-one can predict how the picture will pan out, it's always important to work towards a future which you think will be positive and productive. In my experience it's pointless to live your life in any other way. Of course we can all be cynical about what motivates politicians (and my goodness this is - of all moments - a time that reinforces such feelings of cynicism). But if we don't ask them to step up to the plate, who will?


Some years ago we'd have thought it highly improbable that we'd have a coalition government - but that's what we got. That was in far less dramatic times than we're experiencing now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I should have read the ballot paper as asking do

> you want to (1) stay; or (2) leave (whatever that

> means - we don't know)!

>

>


I think if you'd read the small print, robbin, you'd have found that that's exactly what it did say. That's the reality of the choice that our 'leading politicians' gave us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd rather the centre-right Tory MPs and the centre-left Labour MPs join with the Lib Dems and create a new centrist party. Leave the true left-wings and the right-wings out in the cold where they should be.


As I said the other day, Labour has always been a coalition of sorts... and that's what has got them to the point they are now. Extending that coalition will probably only fuel the fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly possible Loz. The Lib Dems came about from the old Liberals and the SDP, who in turn were disgruntled Labour MPs concerned about Labour lurching to the far left under Michael Foot and the influence of Militant Tendency (Corbyn/Foot, Militant/Momentum, talk about history repeating itself!), and who also attracted Tories not happy with Thatcher, Tebbit et al...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...