Jump to content

Naughty Bradley Wiggins ?


Mick Mac

Recommended Posts

Careful Mick.....as ???? said to me four years ago.


The lady on Newsnight representing Sporting Integrity said tonight:

What we might be talking about here is

the overuse of medicines and the correlation with suddenly becoming an elite athlete.


She was speaking in general rather than specific to Bradley Wiggins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a non story imo. Bitter Russians who DID cheat with performance enhancing drugs show how low they really are by trying to discredit athletes who actually win medals because they are better than everyone else shocker.


Common sense tells anyone that all of the named athletes have given drugs tests in pretty much every competition they compete in and athletes can be tested at ANY time during training periods too. In fact, isn't that why the Russians got caught?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems drug cheats are usually a step ahead of the testers. I don't know which athlete it was who was recently promoted from 9th position in London or before to a medal winning position. All the others were found to have cheated. Ironically the same guy was throw out of Rio for drug cheating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a non story imo. Bitter Russians who DID

> cheat with performance enhancing drugs show how

> low they really are by trying to discredit

> athletes who actually win medals because they are

> better than everyone else shocker.

>

> Common sense tells anyone that all of the named

> athletes have given drugs tests in pretty much

> every competition they compete in and athletes can

> be tested at ANY time during training periods too.

> In fact, isn't that why the Russians got caught?



All of which is completely irrelevant to the OP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a non story imo. Bitter Russians who DID

> > cheat with performance enhancing drugs show how

> > low they really are by trying to discredit

> > athletes who actually win medals because they

> are

> > better than everyone else shocker.

> >

> > Common sense tells anyone that all of the named

> > athletes have given drugs tests in pretty much

> > every competition they compete in and athletes

> can

> > be tested at ANY time during training periods

> too.

> > In fact, isn't that why the Russians got

> caught?

>

>

> All of which is completely irrelevant to the OP


Eh? You posted about a story currently in the news, Blah Blah gave a perfectly sound opinion on said story, can't quite see the irrelevance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But where is the evidence of overuse of medicine? The leaked report shows legitimate use of treatments for things like allergies and Asthma etc, permission for which has to be gained in advance of treatment being used. Even athletes have medical conditions that need treatment from time to time. That is clearly very different to misuse of banned substances for performance enhancing purposes. You are making an assumption in your OP that just isn't true.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there is no evidence of overuse. That is just an assumption by the OP. All of the medications prescribed are for conditions from Asthma to Hayfever. Pretty normal stuff. But they are required permission because they contain trace elements of substances that could fail a drugs test. That's all there is to it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - and speaking as an asthmatic who carries a ventolin inhaler and is required to take a steroid inhaler too, I find it surprising that Wiggins is taking what he is taking - this doctor says his injections are what he would expect for serious uncontrollable asthma symptons ;


"Wiggins himself in his autobiography said he had only ever received an injection for an immunisation and some drips. You are not likely to forget an intramuscular injection before every major Grand Tour that you have competed in for the win.


The second aspect is that Triamcinolone acetonide is used to control severe asthma or other allergies that are unresponsive to other forms of treatments.


It is not a first-line therapy and it certainly wouldn?t be something that I would be comfortable giving to a rider as a preventative medicine. So one of two things is going on: either they have prescribed it as a preventative medicine, which doesn?t sit well with me, or he had such serious symptoms that they were completely uncontrollable, and that just happened to happen coincidentally a couple of days before he contested a Grand Tour. And at different times of the season, because the Giro isn?t anywhere near pollen season and nobody suffers from dramatic allergies in the Giro. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm not sure about that, but they should be closely monitored to justify the appropriate use and protect other athletes from the benefits of one athlete's excessive use, where the relevant drug has absolutely proven performance benefits as in this case.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lance Armstrong was a total hero that overcame

> cancer and went on tobwin multiple tours.

>

> Until he wasnt anymore...


But he broke the rules, and Wiggins hasn't. There is a debate to be had about TUEs but amidst all the headlines about Wiggins "fighting for his reputation" it's important to remember that everything he's taken was with the full approval of the UCI's anti-doping doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

---------------------------------------------

>

> The second aspect is that Triamcinolone acetonide

> is used to control severe asthma or other

> allergies that are unresponsive to other forms of

> treatments.

>

> It is not a first-line therapy and it certainly

> wouldn?t be something that I would be comfortable

> giving to a rider as a preventative medicine. So

> one of two things is going on: either they have

> prescribed it as a preventative medicine, which

> doesn?t sit well with me, or he had such serious

> symptoms that they were completely uncontrollable,

> and that just happened to happen coincidentally a

> couple of days before he contested a Grand Tour.

> And at different times of the season, because the

> Giro isn?t anywhere near pollen season and nobody

> suffers from dramatic allergies in the Giro. "


Corticosteroids ARE a first line therapy for asthma. Moreover exercise induced asthma (EIA) is understood to be a subset of asthma or a unique type of exercise induced broncho-constriction (EIB), for which triamcinolone has efficacy, independent of seasonal allergies or atopic asthma. There's nothing inherently suspicious about its use for EIA, though I wouldn't comment personally on Wiggins's use of course.


http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/714791_7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sir Bradley Wiggins


Inhalers


?13 June 2008 - salbutamol (200ug inhalation dosage, as needed for 12-month period)

?12 December 2008 - salbutamol (inhalation dosage, as needed for 12-month period)

?16 December - salbutamol (two puff dosage twice a day for 12-month period), formoterol (two puff dosage twice a day for 12-month period) and budesonide (inhalation dosage twice a day for 12 month period)


2010 Move to Team Sky - Injections begin 2011


?26 June 2011 ? triamcinolone acetonide (50mg intramuscular dosage, one time injection)

?29 June 2011 - triamcinolone acetonide (50mg intramuscular dosage, one time injection)

?April 2013 - triamcinolone acetonide (50mg intramuscular dosage, one time injection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Wikipedia:


"These included three intramuscular injections of the drug triamcinolone ? a powerful corticosteroid which has been described as a huge performance enhancer.


This is the same performance enhancing drug which Lance Armstrong was convicted of using"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sir Bradley Wiggins

>

> Inhalers

>

> ?13 June 2008 - salbutamol (200ug inhalation

> dosage, as needed for 12-month period)

> ?12 December 2008 - salbutamol (inhalation dosage,

> as needed for 12-month period)

> ?16 December - salbutamol (two puff dosage twice a

> day for 12-month period), formoterol (two puff

> dosage twice a day for 12-month period) and

> budesonide (inhalation dosage twice a day for 12

> month period)

>

> 2010 Move to Team Sky - Injections begin 2011

>

> ?26 June 2011 ? triamcinolone acetonide (50mg

> intramuscular dosage, one time injection)

> ?29 June 2011 - triamcinolone acetonide (50mg

> intramuscular dosage, one time injection)

> ?April 2013 - triamcinolone acetonide (50mg

> intramuscular dosage, one time injection




So his Asthma miraculously disappeared between 2008 & 2011 and 2011 and the present day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they got caught because of a whistle blower


Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a non story imo. Bitter Russians who DID

> cheat with performance enhancing drugs show how

> low they really are by trying to discredit

> athletes who actually win medals because they are

> better than everyone else shocker.

>

> Common sense tells anyone that all of the named

> athletes have given drugs tests in pretty much

> every competition they compete in and athletes can

> be tested at ANY time during training periods too.

> In fact, isn't that why the Russians got caught?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...