Jump to content

The major works 2015. Going to court


Delainie

Recommended Posts

I'd like to know if anyone that lives in Oxenford street, copleston road and oglander road , bellenden road and everthorpe, whether you had or have issues re the external works programme called safe warm and dry, whether you refused to pay, etc etc. My property was partly painted at front and absolutely nothing to the rear of property, too long a story and don't wish to bore you with details. I did not pay and am now being taken to court. Has anyone else refused to pay and been called to court. I have no idea how it'll pan out, although I have photos, emails ,Harriet Hartman letter, to prove I was trying to get work done and now saltash the contractors, Shan the liaison officer and a manager Chris ayton from the council have actually lied on their witness statements saying I never gave them access. That I was difficult from the start, it really beggars belief. I'm really not happy I'm being accused of lying, They never ever asked for access, they all climbed over the supposedly repaired roofs, without a walkway or duct board. Any experiences?? Surely I'm not the only one who refused to pay! Bit anxious re the court though if the judge is fair I think he will see I contacted several people involved with the work, spend hours in Harriet harmans surgery, trying to get them to do the work, why would I do this if I then refuse access. I will never ever buy a leasehold ever again. The council take the absolute p***
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the judge has seen it all before and you may well find that it never gets to court and council are using heavy-handed tactics. Council will know it can't stand-up in court without evidence, which by your information they cannot possibly have ie. proof of having requested access and been denied.

Yours will not be the only case like this I suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Kidkruger, I was told by council that I need one of the people who said I denied access , to visit and arrange with contractors a date before we go to court (court date 13/02/17)to get work booked in and work has to be booked and done before end of March, that the judge will be angry if nothing is agreed. I know I'm anxious , mere me taking on council however I said I hope the judge isn't then angry with me as I ticked mediation which the court offered, council didn't, it's only now 3 weeks before court date that they are trying to get me to arrange so when we go to court, if it's all agreed, well the judge won't see and hear my evidence, if we have reached an agreement. It's more the principle,the contractors behaved as though they were working on a building site, one even opened the bathroom window when my neighbour was sitting on toilet, just turning up willy hilly outside Windows, no Id, no uniform, I call the warm safe and dry programme carry on saltash, it really was a joke. Damaged my property and asked for ?5000. Anyhow I just hope the judge looks at my evidence and is fair.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do have to pay towards external works, unfortunately - it's the terms of the lease you signed when you bought the property.

The major works schedule will have been circulated in advance and the cost should have been communicated. Was that not the case?


If you are arguing that the work wasn't done to specification, then you should make that point to the council, as they are managing the contract for the work.


If they are saying this work didn't happen because you didn't allow access, then - if they are now offering to get the work done - you need to arrange with them to do this.


It's not going to happen that you don't have to pay.


A last resort would be that they approach your mortgage company and ask for the sum to be added to the mortgage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the judge / magistrate knows the plight of individuals versus councils and organisations, he/she won't expect you to be a court expert and will guide you through the procedure. Just make sure your story is straight and the opponent can't prove their allegations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Kidkruger, I feel a little less anxious now. Nxjen, yes thanks for reminding me about those posts, perhaps I could print them and bring to court, so he/she can see it's not just me with issue. Doubt I'm allowed to though!

Thanks Angelina, I know what the lease entails, had they done the work, I'd have paid by instalments and if substandard, I'd have gave them a year to resolve and then put payments on hold till they sorted it. This is about not doing any work, I don't know about others, to me ?5000 is a lot of money for nothing and by the time they get around to working out the actual cost, still now nearly 2 years and still an estimate, no actual, they would have ?5000 for nothing apart from damage to my property. I have plenty of evidence to back me up, photos, emails, text messages, I tried to get them to do work, waited in to no avail. Looking at council papers, they have no evidence I denied them access. They can't add to mortgage as don't have one. Anyhow I will just have to wait and see on 13th, pleased it's not Friday!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...