Jump to content

Bakerloo line extension - have your say for Peckham Rye


Goldentoothpick

Recommended Posts

If you haven't yet sent TFL your views on the extension, please do so asap.


The current plan extends from Elephant & Castle to > Old kent road (1) > Old kent road (2) > New Cross Gate > Lewisham


They seemed to have missed out Peckham Rye?! If you feel that we need the Bakerloo line extending down to Peckham Rye email TFL and let them know your views. We live in zone 2 but it can take nearly an hour to get to central london at rush hour. Surely Peckham Rye deserves the extension it desperately needs. Come on ED and Peckham fam let's make sure our voices are heard!


GT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People live in the Old Kent Road area who have less access to rail than those on the Peckham / Camberwell route. Why does Peckham Rye deserve it any more than another route to Lewisham?


If the Bakerloo line extension is going to take place at all, developer funding is going to be required. The Peckham route offers considerably less potential for funding - so it's got to be OKR I'm afraid.


Isn't it better that someone somewhere in south East London benefits from tube travel than absolutely nothing at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goldentoothpick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you haven't yet sent TFL your views on the

> extension, please do so asap.

>

> The current plan extends from Elephant & Castle to

> > Old kent road (1) > Old kent road (2) > New

> Cross Gate > Lewisham

>

> They seemed to have missed out Peckham Rye?! If

> you feel that we need the Bakerloo line extending

> down to Peckham Rye email TFL and let them know

> your views. We live in zone 2 but it can take

> nearly an hour to get to central london at rush

> hour. Surely Peckham Rye deserves the extension it

> desperately needs. Come on ED and Peckham fam

> let's make sure our voices are heard!

>

> GT


Sorry but I really don't understand the oft-repeated claims that we're underserved in Peckham Rye - there are regular direct trains to Blackfriars, Victoria and London Bridge, all taking around ten minutes, not to mention having trains to Clapham Junction and Canary Wharf as well. Last time I looked those first three stations were in central London, how does it take you an hour to get there? The OKR is in far greater need of a rail link than we are - in fact I fail to see why we need an extra one at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean Canada Water, of course, Rendel.


I think the rail transport from PR is adequate (reliability and industrial action aside). But it seems to me that the Bakerloo extension should really connect to Queens Rd Peckham, instead of the "Old Kent Rd 2" station. That would provide really useful connectivity for the Overground and southern routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sorry but I really don't understand the

> oft-repeated claims that we're underserved in

> Peckham Rye - there are regular direct trains to

> Blackfriars, Victoria and London Bridge, all

> taking around ten minutes, not to mention having

> trains to Clapham Junction and Canary Wharf as

> well. Last time I looked those first three

> stations were in central London, how does it take

> you an hour to get there? The OKR is in far

> greater need of a rail link than we are - in fact

> I fail to see why we need an extra one at all.


All we deserve is Thameslink and Southern ;)


What did we do to deserve that !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You mean Canada Water, of course, Rendel.

>

> I think the rail transport from PR is adequate

> (reliability and industrial action aside). But it

> seems to me that the Bakerloo extension should

> really connect to Queens Rd Peckham, instead of

> the "Old Kent Rd 2" station. That would provide

> really useful connectivity for the Overground and

> southern routes.


When they build the pedestrian bridge from Canada Water

to Canary Wharf it'll be the same :)



The issue I have is we're building more flats and Thameslink

and Southern can't provide enough trains - I'd move both to

Overground under TFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweptwind Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the Bakerloo line extension is going to take

> place at all, developer funding is going to be

> required. The Peckham route offers considerably

> less potential for funding - so it's got to be OKR

> I'm afraid.


'Developer funding'? It's largely taxpayer funded and maintained. The development is made massively more profitable by a taxpayer subsidy to said developers. It is the taxpayer funding the development not the other way round. There are considerably more long term taxpayers in the densely populated, established communities of Camberwell and Peckham than the brown field sits on the OKR. So one could argue that the Peckham route offers considerably more funding... You just have to remember that 'government money' is actually our money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Goldentoothpick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If you haven't yet sent TFL your views on the

> > extension, please do so asap.

> >

> > The current plan extends from Elephant & Castle

> to

> > > Old kent road (1) > Old kent road (2) > New

> > Cross Gate > Lewisham

> >

> > They seemed to have missed out Peckham Rye?! If

> > you feel that we need the Bakerloo line

> extending

> > down to Peckham Rye email TFL and let them know

> > your views. We live in zone 2 but it can take

> > nearly an hour to get to central london at rush

> > hour. Surely Peckham Rye deserves the extension

> it

> > desperately needs. Come on ED and Peckham fam

> > let's make sure our voices are heard!

> >

> > GT

>

> Sorry but I really don't understand the

> oft-repeated claims that we're underserved in

> Peckham Rye - there are regular direct trains to

> Blackfriars, Victoria and London Bridge, all

> taking around ten minutes, not to mention having

> trains to Clapham Junction and Canary Wharf as

> well. Last time I looked those first three

> stations were in central London, how does it take

> you an hour to get there? The OKR is in far

> greater need of a rail link than we are - in fact

> I fail to see why we need an extra one at all.




Not to mention very regular and reliable buses to pretty much everywhere. There are now three directly into the heart of the City. 78 from nunhead/peckham rye and the 40 and 42 from ED.


The 12 and 176 into the heart of the West End.


The 185 to Victoria.



And anyway, a report today shows that tube commuting exposes you to 8x the amount of pollution compared to driving (and I assume riding on a bus too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly I still think the biggest crime against transport in the area was cancelling the cross river tram running from Peckham to the elephant, Holborn and so on.


A clean reliable form of transport that could have been extended on to crystal palace or linked up to the Croydon tram system at a fraction of the proposed cost of the bakerloo extension .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that on paper the bus service is great but in practice it's another thing entirely.

Don't even think of spending less than an hour from Barry Road to Oxford Circus at most times of the day from 0700 to 2300. That works for the 176 too. The 185 can sometimes surprise but not often.

I also agree that the tram over the Thames from Peckham to Camden ought to have been allowed to continue, but it wasn't to be. Even if it terminated at Aldwych/Temple/Holborn it would have been great.

Again, a guided bus system (yes, my old hobbyhorse) would be great but it's never been a winner with city planners and councillors and marketeers because they're seen as "trams on the cheap".

If you can, walk. It'll help your physical and mental health because it's better than sitting in a packed 176 with the usual morons who CBA to move down/go up to the top deck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bus is a completely unsuitable method for commuting from SE London into the centre. The time it takes is completely disproportionate to the distance travelled. And 1hr (or more) of stop/start traffic (often with a heavy-footed driver) leaves me feeling very travel-sick. I guess they can be useful for local journeys of 2-3 miles though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The bus is a completely unsuitable method for

> commuting from SE London into the centre. The time

> it takes is completely disproportionate to the

> distance travelled. And 1hr (or more) of

> stop/start traffic (often with a heavy-footed

> driver) leaves me feeling very travel-sick. I

> guess they can be useful for local journeys of 2-3

> miles though.


^this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aria has been great with fitting a new shower and rearranging some pipe work for us. He was quick, approachable and even highlighted that the shower manufacturer offered a cheap installation (we didn’t do this in the end as needed something else done as well). He was able to complete the work soon after his initial visit. Would recommend!
    • Yes but the point of saying "through" or "thru" is that it unambiguously includes Friday!!! "Monday to Friday" might or might not include Friday. "Monday through Friday" very clearly does include Friday. Nothing wrong with a useful expression that just happens to come from America, surely? Much of our modern language does originally, just as much of their language came from us originally. Times change, and all that ....
    • I'd say sending them  the affidavit and offering them a full refund for the return of the machines is a great idea. By far the least hassle for you, and will put them on the spot if they have been telling lies. If you end up having to give them the refund, you will be no worse off than you were before the sale (assuming they don't damage the machines, of course). But I know nothing about the legal issues (if any) around all this. Citizens Advice might help if you run into further difficulties? Good luck! 
    • The point is that these door to door sellers are doing it under false pretences, and claiming to be part of a project that doesn't exist.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...