Jump to content

New pound coin


TheArtfulDogger

Recommended Posts

It looks the spitting image of the old Threepenny Bit (thruppence), which for those of you not old enough to remember, was used before decimilisation came in 1971. Maybe Brexit Day and the launch of this new coin have something in common after all.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With inflation going the way it is, the only use for it will be the same as the 3d bit - in an xmas pudding. For this reason I already like it.


What is beyond belief is why the govt thought it necessary to change the design. They are printing billions in 'quantitative easing' yet suddenly got worried by a few million fake coins. Against the cost of changing all the slot machines?


But perhaps it will persuade those still demanding you use one for supermarket trolleys to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the sauciness of the thrupenny bit slang reference but also I like the introduction of a small knobbly coin again.

For far too long we've had to put up with them round, milled edged ol' suckers.

Fair got on me thrups so they did.


I reckon shove ha'penny boards (played with the modern pound bits) will make a comeback, I'll encourage it enthusiastically, even vigorously.


What shall we call 'em? How about pound bits? Mmmm, not sure.

16 ouncers? Mmmm even less sure.

The 12-sided bastard? I like it, but not sure it'll catch on.


Requires a little more thought. Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Dodo sounds good there Max. If in fact the 12 sided 'bit' is named a dodecagon as you claim. I'll take your word for it of course.

When making a small wager, would it work? I'll have a Dodo to win on Shapely Goddess in the 3:15? Not completely sure about that.

And what of the subsequent, inevitable dialogue in the pub?

Down to me last Dodo? Ain't got a Dodo to me name? Sub us a few Dodo 'til payday?


I'm not sure it quite 'sings' all that well.

But never mind it's early days yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, twelve sides, I'm thinking about slanging it up as an 'Apostles'. Yes I am and that'll be the last time I 'quotes' it an' all.

I think the idea of a single coin with a plural nomenclature*, for want of a better phrase, would be ginchy and marvy beyond all reason, really.

It'd trip off the tongue(s)of the billionaire, the barrister, the barrow boy and the b@stard in the pub, whose blathering warrants a slap, with equal alacrity.

Yes, it's a word of the people so it is. Demotic, and don't let any bleeder tell you any different. Really. Don't.


Initial thoughts about extensions of the newly-minted and soon to sweep the nation term: A Gospeller-?4:00 A Betrayal-?11:00: A Thomas - a coin whose authenticity is perhaps untrustworthy: A Ressurection a complete fake.


*If nomenclature is the 'mot juste' I'm seeking here, d'accorde, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What exactly is the problem with fake coins ?


Off the top of my head.. the businesses that take them may be unable to pay them into the bank. Reduces the government's power to money supply and therefore inflation. And also, what dodgy activities the proceeds might be funding...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What exactly is the problem with fake coins ?

>

> Off the top of my head.. the businesses that take

> them may be unable to pay them into the bank.

> Reduces the government's power to money supply and

> therefore inflation. And also, what dodgy

> activities the proceeds might be funding...


Just a little bit of privatized QE & an expanded money supply that directly reduces the cost of borrowing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is the problem with fake coins?


Leaving aside the macro-economic impact on the value of currency, I think the practical issue for shops and businesses is that those coins can't/shouldn't be paid into their bank accounts as mentioned above.


So the business has sold an asset for (say) ?10, its books and records show a transaction for ?10 and it pays tax on the ?10 transaction, but when it comes to pay the money for that transaction into the bank, the business has only received ?9 which it can pay into its bank account and is left holding a token that doesn't have a remaining "value" of ?1. The business has no ability to change the value of the transaction or reduce the amount of tax it pays because the "value" of the transaction is the same. The bank has no obligation to accept a fake coin and won't give the business a real ?1 in exchange. Fake coins are basically fraud on the business that receives them.


Of course it's a lot more complicated than that, because the vast majority of people who use a fake ?1 to pay for something don't intend to defraud the business and in reality, businesses keep the fake ?1 in their float if they won't be accepted by the bank and may then pay it back out to another customer (which is I think your point - does it really matter?) - I would say yes - as ultimately you're holding something which purports to be ?1 which isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What exactly is the problem with fake coins?

>

> Leaving aside the macro-economic impact on the

> value of currency, I think the practical issue for

> shops and businesses is that those coins

> can't/shouldn't be paid into their bank accounts

> as mentioned above.

>

> So the business has sold an asset for (say) ?10,

> its books and records show a transaction for ?10

> and it pays tax on the ?10 transaction, but when

> it comes to pay the money for that transaction

> into the bank, the business has only received ?9

> which it can pay into its bank account and is left

> holding a token that doesn't have a remaining

> "value" of ?1. The business has no ability to

> change the value of the transaction or reduce the

> amount of tax it pays because the "value" of the

> transaction is the same. The bank has no

> obligation to accept a fake coin and won't give

> the business a real ?1 in exchange. Fake coins

> are basically fraud on the business that receives

> them.

>

> Of course it's a lot more complicated than that,

> because the vast majority of people who use a fake

> ?1 to pay for something don't intend to defraud

> the business and in reality, businesses keep the

> fake ?1 in their float if they won't be accepted

> by the bank and may then pay it back out to

> another customer (which is I think your point -

> does it really matter?) - I would say yes - as

> ultimately you're holding something which purports

> to be ?1 which isn't.


Do banks really refuse them - I'd have though shops would be more careful in that case.


I had many Scottish notes refused a few years back. The girl in Sainsburys

not long ago said to me "do you want a Scottish note" answer "NO"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a long time since I paid a float into a bank but as a teenage shop girl (during the period that ?1s existed I hasten to add) we used to scrutinise the payable in carefully for that reason and banks definitely did reject coins. In these days of depositing cash via machines/envelopes etc, it may well be different in terms of what happens in practice.


The bank is definitely under no legal obligation to accept a fake coin if they spot it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, twelve sides, I'm thinking about slanging it up as an 'Apostles'...

...Initial thoughts about extensions of the

> newly-minted and soon to sweep the nation term: A

> Gospeller-?4:00 A Betrayal-?11:00: A Thomas - a

> coin whose authenticity is perhaps untrustworthy:

> A Ressurection a complete fake.


Ok, and with 12 sides suggesting (as well as divine inspiration) a Brexitish nod towards a return to the marmiteovaltine days of the imperial system perhaps with 4 apostles (or apostlesles) in a Gospell (the new imperial fiver) we'd have 3 Gospells in a Messiah (it's new tenner cousin with dodgy ones known as a Brian); your Betrayal would - like the old guinea - mainly be used for auctions or payments of commissioned acts and would always include VAT.


I can already hear punters boasting of winning a Gospel Quire at Kempton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...