Jump to content

Vote: What /Who will you be Voting for Election ?


natty01295

Recommended Posts

Lib Dem probably but 'anyone but Corbyn' could lead me to the Tories in our constituency, but I'd like a strong remain vote, a revival in the LDs fortune, and still not sure if i could put an X next to a Conservative as a small drudge of lefty Tribalism still remains in my soul.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservative voters, of which there will be many on this forum, rarely poke their heads above the parapet here or elsewhere these days, despite the fact their party will probably sweep all before it this June.


It's just not worth the lorry load of opprobrium that would inevitably be tipped on their heads by those who think that a vote for the Tories = the end of the NHS and the imminent introduction of conscription.


There will also be UKIP'ers among us but they live in the shadows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Conservative voters, of which there will be many

> on this forum, rarely poke their heads above the

> parapet here or elsewhere these days, despite the

> fact their party will probably sweep all before it

> this June.

>

> It's just not worth the lorry load of opprobrium

> that would inevitably be tipped on their heads by

> those who think that a vote for the Tories = the

> end of the NHS and the imminent introduction of

> conscription.

>

> There will also be UKIP'ers among us but they live

> in the shadows



Mate, Theresa May and Jeremy Hunt are busily planning the sneak privatisation of the NHS.


Mr Hunt has been forming disturbingly close relations with Kaiser Permanante, which should concern us all.


The NHS - you'll miss it when it's gone...



Back on topic, I'm not sure. Jim Dowd was my MP, and he's retiring. If his replacement is a parachuted Momentum tosser then I may have to go LD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whatever happens, it won't be 'gone' Joe (mate)



So what do you think the NHS will look like in future years? Right now there's no requirement to buy insurance, and it's free at the point of delivery.


It's also totally unsustainable in its current form, and I firmly believe this is part of a long term plan to bring in privatisation by other means, by the back door. When the Health Secretary is spending time with big US healthcare providers I get very worried.


Do you honestly believe that the NHS is safe? It needs reform, it needs proper investment, it needs to be respected for what it is. It's being undermined by the very people supposed to protect it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More and more employers offering private insurance (it's taxed as a benefit though)


Surely that leaves those without that offer on "basic" NHS.


Anyway I didn't take up my employers BUPA offer and was in general ward when I was in Kings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think back to a time when Voting mattered and

> may even of made a difference.

>

> Perhaps we should all vote 1 candidate out in a

> series of rounds until only one candidate

> remained.

>

> DulwichFox.


Proportional representation you mean. Fairer system I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a dilemma for me - either Helen Hayes (who I like, is a responsible local MP and stuck to her guns and voted against triggering Article 50 in line with the majority referendum result in my constituency but is Labour, so a vote for a Corbyn government which is the last thing I want), or Lib Dem (pro-Europe, but not a fan of Tim Farron's voting record on women's issues or the Lib Dem decision to break election pledges last time they were in government).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> steveo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Whatever happens, it won't be 'gone' Joe (mate)

>

>

> So what do you think the NHS will look like in

> future years? Right now there's no requirement to

> buy insurance, and it's free at the point of

> delivery.

>

> It's also totally unsustainable in its current

> form, and I firmly believe this is part of a long

> term plan to bring in privatisation by other

> means, by the back door. When the Health Secretary

> is spending time with big US healthcare providers

> I get very worried.

>

> Do you honestly believe that the NHS is safe? It

> needs reform, it needs proper investment, it needs

> to be respected for what it is. It's being

> undermined by the very people supposed to protect

> it.


It needs reform but why should it be respected for what it is? some of us think it's grossly overbloated and inefficient and reluctant to face any reform. Real spend has increased every year since the Tories came to power as it happens; private companies play a significant role in far more efficient and better results health services elsewhere. It's not the Binary choice of NHS or America that those who like inertia claim.



...i know that challenging it is meant to be heresy but it's a growing opinion. If it's the envy of the world how come literally no-one else in the world has a similar system? The Labour party is widely overestimating how effective the NHS is as an attack weapon on the Tories for this reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, fair point. "Respected for what it is" was a poor choice of words on my part.


I'm not blind to the failings of the NHS. However, I believe strongly that a 'free at the point of delivery' healthcare system is something a nation like ours should have. If you're in dire medical need you shouldn't be having to worry about paying for it, and no one should be forced to keep working into old age to keep healthcare benefits.


I guess I feel that one of the most basic functions of government is the protection of its citizens, and that (to me) includes making sure healthcare is as effective and efficient as it can be. My personal experience of the NHS has been that it saved my wife's life once and my mothers twice, but I know it can make appalling errors too hat result in needless death. It needs reform, it needs more money, but we also owe it to ourselves to fight for healthcare as a basic right.


I do not beieve privatisation has any place in critical or intensive healthcare (I accept, reluctantly, that in other areas there is more scope for argument). It runs anathema to the stated aims when profit becomes a motive. For the record I think the same about a number of other areas, including defence. Despite being something of a lefty I'm not a woolly thinker. Private enterprise can do great things for us in their right areas. Stuff that is focused on keeping people alive is not one of them.


(This is not to say that I do not believe private healthcare should exist at all. Much like private education everyone has the right to spend their money how they see fit, but there must exist a basic level of care which everyone has access to and which is properly funded and run and will care for you in a serious emergency without turfing you out as soon as you meet a minimum criteria for survival.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHS: 'It can't go on as it is and throwing more money at it is not the answer...' is a mantra we hear a lot these days and it presages a change that only a thumping majority for the Tories would allow them to attempt.


We all have anecdotes about the wonderful/shocking - usually wonderful - treatment we've received at the hands of the NHS but I've heard some corkers recently (from practitioners) about appalling waste and their paranoid fear of being sued that leads to arse covering, over prescribing, doling out unnecessary antibiotics etc, and about undeserving, demanding, insulting, violent 'patients' that lead me to think the mantra is right.


It can't go on.


Anyway, my original point was about the routine, rabid demonisation of the Tories, which apart from being a huge YAWN, is pretty irrational IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Option 1.  Let them go bust.  Government takes over, until an appropriate solution found.  This happens with failing train operating companies  Option 2.  Anyone who made money on the privatisation, or their immediate descendants, bail them out  Obviously the latter isn't going to happen but makes me feel better/superior. What do you reckon?  Big picture.  Small picture as I posted elsewhere is that they were good when we had a leaking main.  And of course mass redundancies need to be avoided.
    • Hi my mum has a lovely frenchi Teo   he needs to be walked , as mum (80) is a bit fragile . he is a lovely dog , a bit nervous when around other dogs . Mum lives in Rast Dulwich . how much do you charge ?  
    • Plenty for sale online from various ticket vendors but you'll need to part with £250 and upwards by the looks of it. Out of interest i kept an eye on the prices for the England and Italy Euro final. At one point they were on offer for a couple of grand each. On the day sellers were obviously getting itchy feet and prices dropped somewhat but never went any lower than £400. That was a few hours before kick off. There was plenty still available half an hour before kick off.   Having been to Wembley a couple of times for play off finals i found it to be not a great place to watch football. Sat three rows back from the pitch side advertising hoardings for one game and way way up in the gods for the other. We felt to far away from the pitch on both occasions. Up in the goods was just stupid because we felt cut off as well.  I don't think it was rebuilt with acoustics in mind either. Even with most of our 25k fans singing it never sounded loud because it's pretty much uncovered and too open.   Happy hunting!
    • It doesn't work as a commercial venture.  Bit churlish to say I told you so.  I told you so.  I'll send less greetings cards.  What pees me off is international postage where you can no longer send light letters at 10 grammes, normal ones up to 20g, now all at the much more expensive 100 g  Didn't we vote to take back control and price everything according to irrational units like ounces? That's some obscure humour btw   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...