Jump to content

Hacked tweet sent on The Perryvale's account


Brulysses

Recommended Posts

Brought to my attention by SNARL, this was tweeted by the twitter account of the Perryvale bar in response to a tweet about the cat serial killer: 'it's just a cat...#pussybashing They taste great with a pinot grigio !!' I can't believe that a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well) would tweet something like this, it's in extremely poor taste and I for one will boycott both the Perryvale and the Crooked Well.


(Title changed by Admin)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have already removed it however someone has a screenshot of the tweet, cue rampant social media hysterical "realy[sic] hope you go out of business" type messages and the original post here to stir up disrespect. Personally I like pinot grigio.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what did they think the original tweet would do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a serious problem, which is exactly what this forum is for...idiot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Did you speak to them directly before making your decision to boycott? Because I reckon the responsible thing to do would be to give them the chance to speak in their own defence before condemning them for something it seems (note I say 'seems') for which they are not to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brulysses Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So what did they think the original tweet would

> > do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I

> am

> > calling out a commercial organisation for a

> > sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is

> a

> > serious problem, which is exactly what this

> forum

> > is for...idiot.

>

> Did you speak to them directly before making your

> decision to boycott? Because I reckon the

> responsible thing to do would be to give them the

> chance to speak in their own defence before

> condemning them for something it seems (note I say

> 'seems') for which they are not to blame.


^this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they think that's a joke I'll gladly join a boycott, but as they're disclaiming responsibility and seemingly taking action it might have been more seemly to ask for an explanation and then post about them if it was unsatisfactory.


ETA Sorry posted before saw JoeLeg's post - what he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Quote


"This horrible tweet did not come from the Perryvale

or it's staff and we are looking into this. We are

deeply sorry"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you said it's a respectable company however it made a mistake, it's apologised for it and positive action has been taken. This forum is meant to be a fun and useful place for East Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.


Great, you've called out "a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well)", you're going to boycott them but why make all the staff 'suffer' because of lost business? Do we really need comments like "realy[sic] hope you go out of business". Do you think the barman at the Crooked Well should get his shifts cut because of lack of business because of a boycott because of a tweet from someone at the Perryvale that was live for a few hours? I don't.


If they showed support the cat killer and suggest they do more cat killing then yes, take action but in reality it was a joke tweet that went wrong. Noone died and no cats died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b-b-b-but they called me an idiot sir!


I agree with turtle that it's a "tasteless, nasty tweet by this person", it's just the daft storm in a tea cup but let's make it a big issue and bring this small company to its knees for a misdemeanor attitude that annoys me.


It makes some people and small companies scared to be creative or try things out because they fear a massive reprimand from this type of thing instead of simply saying whoops, I won't do that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As you said it's a respectable company however it

> made a mistake, it's apologised for it and

> positive action has been taken. This forum is

> meant to be a fun and useful place for East

> Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a

> commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless

> tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't

> see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest

> Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.

>

Too true. Well posted. Move on everyone. Nothing to see here. This element (Tweeting) of modern life can be truly rubbish. Let's get back to jolly banter (pub talk as we oldies call it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were hacked and have reported it to the police. I have known Jen and Hector since they opened the Crooked Well and anyone who's ever had any contact with them would know that they would categorically never post something like this. I really hope all those jumping on the hate bandwagon will get back in their boxes as I'd hate for this to negatively affect the businesses that they have worked so hard to build up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I highly doubt they've been "hacked". I suspect

> they've simply delegated social media to the wrong

> staff member. I'm sure it's been dealt with.


doubt it's the Russians.


People do common social engineering things - like use the public WiFi password or something similar or the name of your dog.


Story attached


http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/devastated-bar-owner-claims-she-was-hacked-over-sick-croydon-cat-killer-tweet/story-30295535-detail/story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...