Jump to content

best way to approach neighbours and council re fence & knotweed


JickieC

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have experience of this?


Our back fence needs to be replaced on all three sides. Our landlord put up the fence originally but feels he shouldn't have to foot the bill for all of it again. Which sounds fair enough. To the left of us (as you face away from the house) is council owned and to the right is privately rented. How do we even know who is responsible for what? It seems well murky...


Also the council owned property was riddled with knotweed which the council treated and it seems to be gone from them but has now emerged in our garden! There is also an enormous tree on that property blocking a lot of our light. Does anyone know if it would even be worth contacting the council about these issues and know which area to contact?


I'm know i'm asking a lot but i'm going round in circles trying to figure it out so a tip in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regard to the fence, it's worth being aware that there is no legal requirement to even have a fence unless there is a covenant that requires it, or if you have something that needs to be held back (e.g. livestock,pets,children). That means that if your landlord kindly provided a fence then it is his responsibility to maintain it, on the basis of H&S or if it retains your livestock etc. That said, ignorance is a useful tool sometimes so I'd just politely ask the neighbours if they were intending to maintain 'their' fence and see what happens. Obviously if your landlord made any agreement with the neighbours at the time he put the fence up, i.e. that he was only paying for the fence but they still owned it, then the H&S aspect would stay with them, and if it retains any of their livestock you can insist they prevent escape onto your property.

You can apply to the land registry for the title deed (only a few ?s) and it may show which fence belonged to which house in the past (by a 'T'), but it may not. If you are in a row of identical houses it's worth asking the neighbours which of their fences they think they own as that may establish a pattern in the street, if they were built at the same time, but they do change as new owners take on responsibilities by putting up fences and maintaining them regardless of who originally owned the boundary fence.

With regard to the knotweed, if you have evidence that it came from the council property then you could pursue them for allowing it to escape but it raises the question as to where it came from in the first place and I would be very surprised if they did anything unless you went to court, so I wouldn't even bother with that. I'd just try and kill the knotweed yourself. You can eat the new shoots like rhubarb, so they say - never tried it myself.

As to the blocking the light issue - that's just as tough. There are some rights to light inside your property, but they are very limited and you must be able to demonstrate that the light has changed. Again, best to try ignorance and just write to the council. If you can see any 'dangerous' overhanging branches that might be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The left hand side of out house back and front - fences belong to Southwark Council who are the freeholders. Many years ago the back left hand fence rotted and since we had very young children who could access the neighbours garden and escape down the side entrance (onto a main road), we contacted Southwark to replace the fence on grounds of safety. Took many phone calls, letters, over several months before they would put up chain link fencing. I needed to prove that my children's safety was compromised by the lack of a fence and I believe I had to resort to our local MP in the end to get help. We are talking about 50 feet of fencing to be replaced.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...