Jump to content

Opposing planning on loss of daylight


edanna

Recommended Posts

There is a planning application for converting an old workshop that our house backs onto into a house. The plans show the wall at the bottom of our garden increasing from approx 2.3m to approx 4.8m. Because our garden is only approx 7m long, this means that we would have considerable loss of light to our back rooms and garden. There are some pretty complicated formulas for calculating adequate light so I?m wondering if anyone has experience of objecting to a planning application on this basis and what you did to show the potential effect. Thanks in advance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Penguin68 I?ve already done a lot of googling - in the past I?ve seen threads where people have detailed how they objected in relation to Southwark?s local plan etc - maybe if I?d said that the thread wouldn?t have been lounged quite so quickly!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A neighbour complained on this basis and got the offending bit of building reduced in size. You need to forget about loss of light in your garden although you might as well tack on a mention of loss of amenity (emphasise play area if you have small children). But the important bit in planning terms is the angle that sunlight will come into the windows of the relevant rooms. It is pretty simple to demonstrate. Draw a cross section of the house with the garden and new wall and calculate what the old and new angle will be. However, the dimensions you mention may not be sufficient to fall into the category where you have grounds for complaint.

Look at pages 17/18 for the 25 degree rule in this document.(I'm assuming your house faces south for this to be a major issue)

http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s22935/Appendix%20A%20Residential%20Design%20Standards.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Invite the planning officer to view this from your perspective. We got plans changed from a large extension that overlooked us and a number of neighbours. The owners already had a plan B in their pocked so don't feel that we were Nimby's. The light pollution can be a pain at times as this is something that planning cannot control.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
    • Another recommendation here for Jason.  He came to plaster over a section of ceiling that we had to remove in order to investigate a leak.  He is a really lovely guy, easy to get in touch with and great communication.  He was quick, tidy and competitively priced.  Very happy and I'd have no hesitation in recommending him to anyone.
    • I run my own business making children's themed birthday hampers, party bags and more for all occasions, feel free to get in touch on 07493638779 for more photos of what I do. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...