Jump to content

185


beaver14uk

Recommended Posts

Thanks to the lovely people who spat at one my colleagues on the 185 last Saturday. From what I understand they either hailed the bus too late or were running and he didn't notice them in time to pull up. He then pulled up at the next stop and waited for them then they treated him like this. As a result he had to take is spit kit to Lewisham Police Station for checking DNA samples and so then whole journey from Dulwich to Victoria was cut. Then I got the blame from passengers for being late although I knew none of this until later. Lets hope its not like that tomorrow when I am on 185 again. Oh and I do know Angry Nigel!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope they catch the spitters although not entirely sure what they'll be able to charge them with? Would it be classed as assault? Can they ban them from buses? I've been spat at once and it was a horrible experience.


It's always surprised me how much some people get riled up at the next bus driver to show up after a long wait. Since it's highly unlikely to be his fault (it's more likely to be a bus broken down, traffic or some other incident), why start ranting at the poor sod who is now actually going to get you home/to work/to shops?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't expect they will be caught although the CCTV will be downloaded as to my knowledge it is assault. I was somewhat bemused when the lady at Goose Green said to me "and where have you been" because I didn't know the bus in front was missing and I was bang on time.


Be kind to me tomorrow if you are planning to use the 185.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of one person who was imprisoned for spitting at a tram driver, it is common assault and the penalty is quite high, having said that it is a disgusting thing to do to a person. However if somebody is antagonistic there are insults that are far more cutting and you cant get done for it as far as I know, although I am not a violent person I can get agitated by other peoples disrespect nit picking and if they are being unreasonable I might say something very nasty especially to traffic wardens.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> beaver... a little suggestion perhaps... whilst

> it's nice to keep passengers in the loop this way

> remember there are some things you are not really

> meant to share with the public or those outside of

> your company.


You know, just a hunch, but I reckon beaver14uk isn't his real name ; )


Quite a few London bus drivers have blogs which fly pretty close to the wind, it's a good thing. (http://buncha-eastlondonbus.blogspot.com/ springs to mind))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I have to disagree that Nigel is a nice person. He is a bully and gets a kick out of intimidating passengers. Why does he have a bicycle chain tied around the door to the driver's cab? Why does he have to sound the emergency siren everytime he passes another 185 bus en route?


Val Shawcross is currently investigating my complaint about this dreadful driver. He should have been sacked years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is protecting revenue at the end of the day. The more people escape paying their fares the more you will end up footing the bill - clearly you are happy to do that. I suspect that he chains himself in because he challenges passengers more than others. As for sounding the alarm no he shouldn't really do it - but if thats all you have to worry about I think its really sad. I can't see him getting sacked for doing his job.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beaver


What about the two old ladies whom he shouted at which I reported on this site? I complained to TfL who told me that they had passed it on to East Thames Buses and since then nothing. Do you think it was alright for him to verbally abuse a 90 year old and her partially sighted friend? Is that doing his job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If true no its not alright but as I wasn't there I can't really comment. I do know from reading the posts that some things clearly do not relate to him i.e. he wears an earing he used to be on the N12 I think that some people have muddled him up with someone else. What I do think was out of order is placing somebodys photogragh on a public website.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

were these old ladies wearing disguises ? how do we know they were 90 and partially sighted....it sounds like a classic OAP ruse to me....one made me carry her shopping out of sainsbury's to her car the other day next thing i knew she was loading all her humbugs and mini bottles of whiskey in a rucksack hitching up her skirt and leaped aboard a green Kawasaki Ninja she had parked up at the end of the car park....she even flicked me the bird as she sped away...cheeky layabout
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

wyrdharley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nigel is not angry so long as everyone who gets on

> his bus plays by the rules..... very simple...BTW,

> I know him & he is actually a very nice guy.


Nigel is always angry and grumpy. He is a bully and gets a buzz out of intimidating and bullying vulnerable passengers. There is currently an inquiry underway regarding his behaviour.


Why does he have a strong bicycle chain wrapped around the door of the driver's cab? One can only suspect this is to avoid someone ripping his head off when he attempts to bully the wrong person!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...