Jump to content

Housing immigrants and queue jumping


SteveT

Recommended Posts

I have just heard the discussion about this queue jumping on the BBC news and of course there is no queue jumping of any kind going on.


The politicians are doing nothing outside of the rules of course.


They do house newly arrived immigrants if they have children and enough of them, they will be housed before the local populace.


So as there is no queue jumping then what do we call it when the newly arrived take precedent for housing over the long waiting local and national homeless population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should ship-in any foreigners who are willing to get off their fat, lazy arses and do some work in order to better their lives - and give them a nice council house to get them started as an incentive.


This would allow us to export homegrown feckless Brits who are unwilling to get off their fat, lazy arses, do some work and make something of themselves instead of sitting around demanding their right to council house (for life) and believing made-up drivel that just popped through the letterbox in a BNP leaflet simply because it suits them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, SteveT, we're doing this AGAIN?! Whole family in need of housing but not from round 'ere blah-sodding-blah... REALLY?!


Kel, what are "normal people" exactly, in your estimation? Perhaps you fine citizens demanding this fuct up version of "fair" might investigate the word "humanitarian" instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we should ship-in any foreigners who are

> willing to get off their fat, lazy arses and do

> some work in order to better their lives - and

> give them a nice council house to get them started

> as an incentive.

>



Exactly! I agree with this 110%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked in housing for 10 long miserable years, and this was an oft repeated old chestnut then.


A points based system is the only fair way to allocate social housing, and there wouldn't be a problem if they just BUILT MORE OF IT (6)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old chestnut my hat.


I was on The Southwark Waiting List from 1973 to 1983 and every time I, and many others that I knew, got anywhere near the top I, automatically, went further down the list when a new wave of immigranta, who almost by definition, are "homeless" went straight to the top.


These people had paid nothing whatsoever in our financial system which, of course, is where the money came from to house those in need in the first place.


So Guys much older than me had paid all their various Taxes into the "system" and when THEY wanted to benefit they could not get anywhere as priority was given to people coming from overseas who paid nothing in!


Fair?? lol


Problem is Steve that most reading this are liberal Middle-Class people who are NEVER going to be "inconvenienced" by this so could not give a rats ass, basically.


Its easy to have noble, altruistic, magnaminous views when you and your kin are NOT affected in any way.


Luckily I was given some money in 1983 to buy my own house otherwise I would still, probably, be on the Housing List now...::o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boo-hoo.. where's my council house? I have paid-in! It's my right.. I've been on the waiting list FOREVER waiting for a handout, and then some git from Somalia who's family has been murdered (a lawyer or something useful, possibly) just pitches-up and gets MY handout.. oh WOE IS ME
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ontheedge Wrote:

Tony from your previous posts Imake out you're about 55 so in 1973 you would have been about 19, surely not a priority for social housing I take it you would have been looking for a flat to yourself.


That is exactly right on all accounts ontheedge.


If you live long enough certain things go in cycles though.


I was listening to a Radio Phone-In 2 months ago when a Lady with a strong Jamaican accent was complaining that "all these East Europeans" were preventing her own daughter from getting near the top for priority to Council properties.


The irony was supreme as it was the mass immigration from The Caribbean that prevented many indigenous people gaining Council accommodation in The 1960's/1970's/1980's....what goes round, comes round springs to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would TLS not be priority in 1983 though ontheedge? 10 years is a long time to wait IMO. We should listen to those people who have real experience of this situation, ahead of those who only have a theoretical point of view.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

Boo-hoo.. where's my council house? I have paid-in! It's my right.. I've been on the waiting list FOREVER waiting for a handout, and then some git from Somalia who's family has been murdered (a lawyer or something useful, possibly) just pitches-up and gets MY handout.. oh WOE IS ME


Yeah! "bob" all those single males who are currently in France waiting to get over here have all fled Afghanistan/Iraq/Somalia/Bosnia and 20 other Countries because people in EVERY one of their families has been murdered.


I mean why else would they want to come to Britain?


Why "Britain" incidently??...These Guys cross many Countries to attempt to reach Britain, a Nation where most have no natural allegiance, historically, at all.


If these places are so desperate why have they left all their Women and Children behind to fend for themselves??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Housing System in Southwark??


I've known 7/8 Women/Girls who have cheated the "system" by claiming "violence" always a good score on the points system and in every case their story was fictitious. One Young Girl ( around 19/20 got a place on this basis and within 2 years her Twin Sister and older sister had come down from The Midlands, which they all had to "flee" because of domestic violence.


In each case it was nonsense and they all have decent places within 1 mile of each other near where I used to live near Camberwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Who receives social housing?


Analysis of the Labour Force Survey highlights differential patterns of housing tenure

between the UK-born population and the foreign-born population who have arrived in

the UK during the last five years. The latter are overwhelmingly housed in the private

rental sector, and not in social housing.


Among UK-born heads of households, an estimated 74 percent are owner occupiers,

17 per cent live in social housing and 7 percent are private tenants. In contrast, of

foreign born people who have arrived in the UK in the past five years, about 17 per

cent are owner-occupiers, 11 percent live in social housing and 64 per cent are

private tenants."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

ony just incase you feel like actually educating yourself on what is actually happening in Somalia, try a few of the reports here. Then carry on spouting shit if you like.


I've talked to a few Somalians who, now, have a large Community in Woolwich, thank you.


Of course "some" cases are from people fleeing persecution and tyranny.


What about all the other cases of Somalians here, Legal ( as you have chosen to mention "Somalians" ) ??


Do you honestly believe "most" Somalians here are fleeing persecution and why should the ones that aren't be given "priority" over all British people who are currently on the Housing WAiting List?


Why should the Guys here who are NOT fleeing persecution be given priority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here it is again Tony, seeing as you seem to be hard of thinking this evening:


"Among UK-born heads of households, an estimated 74 percent are owner occupiers,

17 per cent live in social housing and 7 percent are private tenants. In contrast, of

foreign born people who have arrived in the UK in the past five years, about 17 per

cent are owner-occupiers, 11 percent live in social housing and 64 per cent are

private tenants."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My son’s primary school hatched duck eggs, probably under this scheme around 12 years ago.  We were all very upset to hear that 2 of the (5 year old) boys had knocked the incubator over & all eggs smashed.   feeling a lot less sad about that now!  
    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...