Jump to content

"Bigbadwolf's" reply


Ladymuck

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

As explained to Lady Muck earlier, Bigbadwolf was warned nine times in the last four and a half months about his behaviour. Each of these are caused by people complaining to Admin and the team. He has been temporarily banned a few times, allowed back a few times and following those warnings he continually offends people again. Please remember this is not just people saying "I think this message could be offensive" but people saying "I am offended by what I have read".


Nine warnings in four and a half months is so much more than we should be dealing with and the fact they are for one person makes us think why wasn't he banned permanently before. It's a good forum, he makes it fun for a few but he spoils it for more and makes life hard for the team that run it which is not appreciated. There have to be rules for something like the forum to run smoothly and that is why it works well, they are not heavily enforced rules (unless they really have to be) and BBW has been given so many warnings and reprieves and then continually taken the mickey that we just have to put a stop to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BBW has asked me to post (on his behalf) ...


> ... My stance is this: I know

> full well when I'm about to put my foot in it,

> although I don't genuinely go out of my way to

> annoy others and put them off using the forum. To

> suggest that I'm in some way mentally handicapped

> to the point of my fingertips making involuntary,

> knee jerk contributions is quite frankly ludicrous


I apologise for any confusion my original post has caused. There was no intention to suggest any mental handicap in my original post where I said, "involuntary compulsion or behavioural problem". It was Mockney who elevated that description to a "disorder".


"Involuntary compulsion" can allude to, say, an addiction - but not necessarily to drugs - it could be an addiction to risk or danger or confrontation, for example. As for "behavioural problems" ? frankly, if you don't have any, I don't know who has!


I genuinely believe that you?d benefit more by inclusion rather than exclusion. I await the return of your new persona with interest.


Good Luck and Take Care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could say that using the term 'taking the mickey' i.e taking the mick was an offensive way of describing BBW's behaviour.

A mick is considered to be an Irishman. I happen to be one. However I'm not offended in the least. BUT SOME PEOPLE MIGHT SEE IT AS RACIST. You're not going to ban yourself are you?


He 'offended' me on numerous occasions but I always felt it was not to be taken seriously as it wasn't intended to be taken that way. Two warnings a month is enough to ban him? Couldn't you have jury service on the forum to decide these matters publicly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess if the jury then put all the hardwork into the behind the scenes running and hassle or contributed to paying for the forum they could in theory - I'm happy to go with the editorial policy of admin who runs a bleedin' good forum even though I like BBW.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technical problems

Paying for server space

Messages to Admins

Attacks by Trolls

Reported posts

Libel threats from businesses

Police intervention I think before

Personal threats


I think Admin put a list up before he went on holiday, there's probably more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say it was Mick but it could be construed to be so if one was easily offended. As for having a pop at Admin well it's his ball and he can go home anytime he likes with it or ban me. But if you considered me to be having a pop at Admin you missed the point of my post.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can have BBW, Declan on there I'll come and post too but in the meantime this is a great forum and I suspect that's not just down to luck but the way admin has looked after it - so, unless I start to continually disagree with the editorial policy I'm happy to back it.


Wouldn't blame admin if he did take his ball away at some point, can't be fun all 'this' stuff. I'd sometimes be thinking F*ck you lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Technical problems

> Paying for server space

> Messages to Admins

> Attacks by Trolls

> Reported posts

> Libel threats from businesses

> Police intervention I think before

> Personal threats

>

> I think Admin put a list up before he went on

> holiday, there's probably more

________________________________________________________


Sock darning


Pumpkin carving


Chin rubbing


Head scratching


Puffing out cheeks


Leaning back on swivel chair


All these were left of the list however, there may have been "biro chewing" but I cant be sure !



W**F


Oh I forgot " Nose picking "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declan. Sarcastically asking admin if he is going to ban himself for making a remark that you imply could be construed as racist and using capital letters, is in my view having a strong pop at admin. Thats how i understood your post and thats why i commented on it. But correct me if you meant something else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan. Sarcastically asking admin if he is going

> to ban himself for making a remark that you imply

> could be construed as racist and using capital

> letters, is in my view having a strong pop at

> admin. Thats how i understood your post and thats

> why i commented on it. But correct me if you meant

> something else.


It's being sarcastic Mick,nothing else. Lowest form of wit I'm told.Anyway I'm fed up with my posts being interfered with by Admin so won't be posting from now on, unless it's to sell or buy something.


Edited to say I retract my comment that Admin has interfered with my posts as I've no evidence and he assures that he hasn't, in the following post. However I am certain that posts of mine have gone missing and have no idea how that happened and neither has Admin.from contact I've had with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway I'm fed up with my

> posts being interfered with by Admin so won't be

> posting from now on, unless it's to sell or buy

> something.



Sorry you feel that way but I have never interfered with your posts (apart from removing an advertising signature a couple of months ago). Please contact me directly if you think there is a problem, I would rather that than you incorrectly stating that I interfere with your posts.


[edited once]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well since BBW's demise I haven't been offended once! Admin should give BBw the right to reply though even if it is through the lovely ladymuck. I think Admin is a good sort, and everyones patience runs out sooner or later perhaps if we let it lie he may mellow a little.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...