Jump to content

Toyota and other 4x4 recalls (Warning: it's sexist but funny)


PeckhamRose

Recommended Posts

Well , basically it's saying 'all 4x4 drivers are ****, especially the woman ones with their brats and rich husbands' this may or may not be true but why don't they say it...this is just a puerile, unfunny thing to me. No problem with the target but it's schoolboy execution....innit, the Mash would do this far better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you mention Picts and Scots in the same post as midgets & dwarves? Have you been watching too much Lord Of The Rings?


I think you are a closet "heightist" and probably think Scots are short mean people who despite being short can?t reach the bottom of their pockets. Shame, shame. Hoots.



SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is 'littlepeoplist' for a start,

>

> and I have nothing against dwarves or midgets,

>

> or giants and ogres,

>

> Picts and Scots or

>

> Angles and Saxons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurrah, I agree with you all. And it's not just because of the champagne I've just opened in the office. I'm inclined to think that Quids and Sean probably ARE lacking sleep and are too cool respectively, but top and bottom, they're right, it isn't funny. And is a bit lazy and rubbish.


Now the story in the papers this week that men really are better parkers than women on the other hand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally speaking men have better spacial awareness than women so that would make them better at parking.

Thankfully motorcycles park easy in little spaces...


Oh - and to the woman talking on her mobile whilst badly driving her 4x4 past PetsSmart at noon today, who then screamed and yelled at me when I had the audacity to shout at her for nearly driving into me as I was waiting to pull out, and THEN she nearly hit a bus - HHAHAHHAAAHAHHHAHAAHHAHAHAHA. Her kids in the back seat not strapped in were looking a bit anxious too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...