Jump to content

The use of Body Scanners which reveal intimate body parts...


Ladymuck

Recommended Posts

It does me, but least they'll be able to tell me which pocket me bloody phone's in.

But seriously, yes, it bothers me but there is nothing we can do about it if we want the freedom to travel.

Already every time I go to see rellies in USA I get my fingerprints checked and my irises checked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It does me, but least they'll be able to tell me

> which pocket me bloody phone's in.


That's funny! *laughs heartily*



> Already every time I go to see rellies in USA I

> get my fingerprints checked and my irises checked.


Yes but there's a difference between having one's irises/fingerprints checked and having ones bosoms/fanny scrutinized! No?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:


> Yes but there's a difference between having one's irises/fingerprints checked and having ones

> bosoms/fanny scrutinized! No?


Er, I believe one can be uniquely identified by one's fingerprints (and maybe irises?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep. And they'll be on record for ever.


*shrieks in horror* FOREVER??!!! Oh Jesus, Mary and Joseph!!


> I'm gonna be dead in 30ish years. I have to put

> this in perspective.


Practical as always...with added humour...unfortunately the whole thing actually petrifies me (melodramatic I know...but it does)...oh dearie dearie me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no big deal really. Not as if they are asking you to strip off! The scanned images aren't so explicit in detail anyway. The objective is too look for explosives etc and not to ogle at the person.... Besides I've nothing to hide, other than my tiny willy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Besides I've nothing to hide, other

> than my tiny willy.


Exactly! The very idea of airport staff pointing and laughing at your tiny willy! Oh, it's too terrible to contemplate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get wound up enough in Somerfield . Queuing and hanging about at airports is enough to turn my pubes grey, not to mention incompetent staff and the ignorant public, all whilst paying good money for the privilege!! Pah

Now, a private jet would be altogether different ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's no big deal really. Not as if they are asking

> you to strip off!


You say that but:


"The scans have been described by critics as a 'virtual strip search', outlining every contour of the body in detailed anatomical images".


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1239781/Longer-queues-flights-UK-introduces-airport-scanners.html#ixzz0bOStwWSM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>>

> "The scans have been described by critics as a

> 'virtual strip search', outlining every contour of

> the body in detailed anatomical images".

>

> I think the critics will couch their words to suit their argument. For me, being viewed in a body scanner doesn't bother me, in fact the thought of being 'virtually' strip searched sounds quite interesting! I can imagine adopting muscleman poses (without the muscles, unfortunately). Or am I just an extrovert?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...