Jump to content

Roll Deep

Mick Mac

By Mick Mac
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted
How many personas is one allowed on here? Are any of you real or just something engineered to entertain or annoy me? Am I real? Is there anything around the next corner before I reach it? Is this ED's answer to Star Treks holodeck? Should that be hollow?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

Honestly; he was just trying to do a pun. It came out wrong.

Don't worry, if you ever want someone to be there for you, someone you trust and love it's probably not him (but when push comes to shove I reckon it is), but you know, I fucking love him like a brother anyway.


Put it this way...I vouch for him, whatever that's worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HAL9000

HAL9000

Posted
Posted

I'm not trying to make an issue out of this, but when I have pointed out that you were quick to defend personal friends who crapped all over the forum you got quite indignant about it.


In situations like this I think it would be better (given your position) to keep quiet and encourage your friends to apologise on their own behalf and behave themselves in future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RosieH

RosieH

Posted
Posted

Sorry to disagree with you HAL, but I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should mean that they don't get to have an opinion.


It's human nature to defend someone you like whom you feel has been misunderstood, and god knows, there have been rampant examples of people leaping to their friends' defence over perceived slights recently, so I think Mockney is more than entitled to voice his feelings on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ann

Ann

Posted
Posted

Excuse me , does that mean people with the most posts opinions count more than others?


I don't give a damn about Roll Deep or any other who has been banned( has he?). As a public forum, can we all not respect our posts? Genuine that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ian, CC is actually lovely. I can vouch for the

> fella. He just got a bit upset at the thouht that

> a genuine local institution was being cynically

> killed off.


If you are talking about the quiz night thread last week-end it appeared that the 'character' in question was exceedingly pi**ed and used a lot of abusive language and suggested other things that some found offensive.If you read the thread which was removed overnight you wouldn't describe it a someone being a 'bit upset' but extremely upset to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HAL9000

HAL9000

Posted
Posted

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should

> mean that they don't get to have an opinion.


I'm merely making the point that as a general principle, those who stand in judgement should remain impartial.


Anyone can state an opinion, but we have gone beyond that: this judge is acting as counsel for the defence - as it happens, on a thread about some else who was subject to judgment and found guilty because, presumably, he didn't have friends in high places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mockney, I'm curious...please...how can you tell

> (other than by using the search facility - which

> would seem a bit odd in this instance) how many

> posts a user has made? Am I missing a trick?

>

> HAL9000 congratulations to you.


Just click on the name of the poster LM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Just click on the name of the poster LM.


I thank you Declan...and I don't wish to appear ungrateful...but that I am aware of. I was wondering if there was another facility or way of telling. It's just that I am mystified as to why someone would wish to click onto a user's name in this situation. Seems odd to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • Sue
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By Sue · Posted

      If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • McMurphy
      Charter East Dulwich school

      By McMurphy · Posted

      interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...