Jump to content

FRIDAY


woofmarkthedog

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What if you don't read it either today or

> tomorrow?


Oh Lord...another one of those threads...somehow I always respond though...think I might have a problem...



*books appointment with psycho-whatyamacallit*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> morning the streets of ED will be full of sh!te,

> blood and vomit, once again.


Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and restrict my alcohol intake tonight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An interjection eh? Hmmmm...definitely one for

> the Drawing Room...had to look that one up...

>

>

> Definition of interjection on the Web:

>

> ejaculation

>

>

>

> My mistake old bean.


To be fair I think LM may have been confused by the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he said "what up with that, man" [note my insertion of the comma] his meaning may have been clearer, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Balls, cock and nonsense!

>

> I was being perfectly clear.



Well there's no need to get all baity about it old thing. Whilst I don't wish to pick a fight with the [allegedly] scrummiest male forumite, I am obliged to point out that had you been "perfectly clear" LM would have not got confused in the first place, but she did, so you weren't.


Quad Erat Demonstrandum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> To be fair I think LM may have been confused by

> the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he

> said "what up with that, man" his meaning may

> have been clearer, no?


*raises flute of organic prosecco to legalbeagle*


thanks for that legalbeagle...that was exactly how I read it...



*shrugs shoulders and has another slurp of the rather moreish beverage*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of the reader.



Ambiguity is most strongly construed against the party using it: Ambiguitas contra stipulatorem est.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of

> the reader.

>

> Caveat emptor.


Rightie ho. If you say so dear.


[rolls eyes and toddles off to join LM for a glass of bubbly]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> > morning the streets of ED will be full of

> sh!te,

> > blood and vomit, once again.

>

> Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and

> restrict my alcohol intake tonight...


Thanxs LM, and please no not be going on my doorstep, you know it aint right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...