Jump to content

FRIDAY


woofmarkthedog

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What if you don't read it either today or

> tomorrow?


Oh Lord...another one of those threads...somehow I always respond though...think I might have a problem...



*books appointment with psycho-whatyamacallit*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> morning the streets of ED will be full of sh!te,

> blood and vomit, once again.


Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and restrict my alcohol intake tonight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An interjection eh? Hmmmm...definitely one for

> the Drawing Room...had to look that one up...

>

>

> Definition of interjection on the Web:

>

> ejaculation

>

>

>

> My mistake old bean.


To be fair I think LM may have been confused by the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he said "what up with that, man" [note my insertion of the comma] his meaning may have been clearer, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Balls, cock and nonsense!

>

> I was being perfectly clear.



Well there's no need to get all baity about it old thing. Whilst I don't wish to pick a fight with the [allegedly] scrummiest male forumite, I am obliged to point out that had you been "perfectly clear" LM would have not got confused in the first place, but she did, so you weren't.


Quad Erat Demonstrandum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> To be fair I think LM may have been confused by

> the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he

> said "what up with that, man" his meaning may

> have been clearer, no?


*raises flute of organic prosecco to legalbeagle*


thanks for that legalbeagle...that was exactly how I read it...



*shrugs shoulders and has another slurp of the rather moreish beverage*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of the reader.



Ambiguity is most strongly construed against the party using it: Ambiguitas contra stipulatorem est.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of

> the reader.

>

> Caveat emptor.


Rightie ho. If you say so dear.


[rolls eyes and toddles off to join LM for a glass of bubbly]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> > morning the streets of ED will be full of

> sh!te,

> > blood and vomit, once again.

>

> Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and

> restrict my alcohol intake tonight...


Thanxs LM, and please no not be going on my doorstep, you know it aint right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If I buy a soap dispenser and want it to produce foam, do I need to add water? What is the ratio of water to hand soap? 
    • That's a good idea smiley blue , if you or anyone else comes across petitions to end these despicable acts of cruelty to defenceless animals please put on here or start a new thread if you please so we can sign the petition and add our objections to this , I would also like to thank all of you the people for reading these messages and adding your voices to this cruelty,  maybe we can end it 
    • Malumbu, by that measure are police efforts to cut down on anti-social driving by issuing tickets and fines a token effort as well? Surely punitive measures for cyclists breaking the rules will encourage them not to break the rules again? A bit like when you got stopped and taken into the cab of an HGV. The police are currently using that tactic to show those who break the rules cycling that it might lead them to being hit by a lorry due to the driver's having limited vision - the cycling equivalent of a speed awareness course for drivers.    When they stopped you was it because you had broken a rule or was it just more of an education programme and they asked you to take a look and did it change your cycling behaviour in any way? As I said previously there are those who break the rules on cycling out of ignorance (and those out of arrogance) and I am sure they are using HGVs to educate those in the ignorance category and then hitting those in the arrogance category with the PCNs.    
    • Good that PETA is on it but can we add our voices to the fight against this horrible practice? I’m still shocked! A petition maybe? Happy to raise to the RSPCA but don’t want to duplicate efforts. I’ve signed campaigns from RSPCA before which sends it directly to your councillor
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...