Jump to content

Words that have become fashionable for no apparent reason.


randombloke

Recommended Posts

Your chance to lament the execrable words or phrases that are creeping into the English languge.


Starters for ten:

Resource. Do you mean person?

Init. I've got a job init. Oh sorry do you mean you are working in the Information Technology department?

Text speak of any kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, like, really like think that like some words have like really been a bit like overused, no? With that, like, really annoying American/Australian intonation at the end which like makes the like tone of your voice go up like everything you are like saying is actually like a question?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quality.


Used as a universal blokey term of approbation. Absolute quality, mate. In football, a good pass was always a quality ball.


Then "quality" became a value in itself. Spain, for instance, have "quality" all over the park. I'm pretty sure I've heard one pundit describe a team's "quality" as quality. "Their quality is just quality."


Anyway, that's enough qualitative analysis from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Resource. Do you mean person?"


Resource can be people, cash/funding, space (factory space, desk space), raw materials, skills (again, implying people), time, knowledge - any input to an activity which can be consumed and therefore needs to be obtained and lined-up. So in the wider sense when running (say) projects or planning, a 'person' is one kind of resource and during conversation about that kind of 'resource' the term will be used interchangeably with the normal descriptive word. admittedly, often by folks half way through their part-time MBA.


I hate:

- I'm 'loving' it

- 'So' going shopping tommorrow

- 'Sick'. As in, "yeah I went to the festival last week, man it was sick". (which means it was great).


Makes ME 'sick'..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> - 'Sick'. As in, "yeah I went to the festival

> last week, man it was sick". (which means it was

> great).


I don't think yourself should be including things which might indeed be ridiculous but only serve to replace equally ridiculous things you said when you were 'of an age'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...