Jump to content

Fare dodging on the 12


Shaila Shah

Recommended Posts

Fare dodging - we probably think it's only the bad mannered "yoof" and ill tempered feisty people who do this. But no. Last week, our bus got held up by inspectors (rare occurrence) and a young suited and booted male clutching a copy of the FT was found to have not done what he should have. Result? Bus delayed, train missed. All to save ?1.20. What sort of example is this setting???
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pathetic isn't it?


I have lost count of the amount of times I have seen this happen. You are right, the sad thing I noticed is the time I was on the 12 it was 2 professional looking ladies talking about some shoes they had bought. Maybe the savings of not paying the fare!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the 12 everyday and it is amazing how many peoples oysters get "touched on" when the inspectors get on. I find myself turning my ipod off to hear the excuses. "I did put it on" ... no actually luv I saw you get on and you didnt. It costs just over ?60 for a bus pass BUY ONE.

I totally agree that it isnt just the "youth of today" it is the suits that are getting stopped too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone reading the FT is trustworthy.


Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12 because I have a bus pass so please don't assume that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for one will be glad to see the back of the bendy buses - I never feel safe on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone's needs to fare-dodge once in a while when the need arises - and I can confirm that the 12 is a breeze in this respect.


Still, it doesn't compare to the glory days of The Great Travelcard Glitch of 1999, when any daily travelcard dated 1998 worked over the whole tube network for nearly the whole of 1999. Happy days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its

> cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone

> reading the FT is trustworthy.


so very true GG - appearances can be deceptive (its the Grauniad readers I worry about...)


> Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12

> because I have a bus pass so please don't assume

> that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying

> the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for

> one will be glad to see the back of the bendy

> buses - I never feel safe on them.


ah....that explains it. i wondered why some people didn't use the oyster reader (thought you had to touch in/out each time)


brilliant news they are getting rid of the bendy 12 bus - i hate them too (the 176 is soooo much nicer)


see below an abstract from my latest paper due for publication: 'why people fare dodge on the 12 and other bendy buses: the politics, economics and psychology of commuter behaviour'


people who get on at the front = generally pay but sometimes don't

people who get on at the middle = sometimes pay but often don't

people who get on at the back = often don't pay but sometimes do


:)





edited for no reason (and because aliens have taken control of my laptop)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a night bus from North London down to Traf Sq about 18 months ago - and 5 or 6 inspectors jumped on mid-way at about 3 o'clock in the morning (it was mid-week as well) and they must have nabbed the majority of people as not having a valid fare (approx 10 ppl were done).


As someone said above if you have a season ticket oyster then you don't need to swipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, I LOVE the 12 - the bendy bus massively cut journey times on that route, although that seems to have ebbed away over the past year or so.


But I have, once or twice, not paid my fare on there. Not intentionally, but having got on the bus thinking I had a juiced-up oyster card, finding that I didn't, and having the choice to get off at the next stop, go and find an oyster topper upper and catch the next bus, making me late, or not. I didn't do it. You can shoot me if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...