Jump to content

How far would you go to survive?


waynetta

Recommended Posts

I used to decant a 1.5 pint Bachelors packet soup mix into three equal portions and eat with two slices of bread and a one inch-cubed square of cheddar ('number two') - every day - for two years.


And I wasn't even in a plane crash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd eat some of the people on the forum.


Now that you mention it, I rather fancy your liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.


> And that's Catholics HAL, not Christians per se.


No - I don't think so. All Christians (even vegans) are supposed to take communion - even if only symbolically. Otherwise they're not true Christians. What sort of Christians were you thinking of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to decant a 1.5 pint Bachelors packet soup mix into three equal portions and eat with two

> slices of bread and a one inch-cubed square of cheddar ('number two') - every day - for two years.


Is that what brought on the asterisks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it took my life to save ten I'd happily give

> it.......so I wouldn't do absolutely 'anything' to

> survive. We are nothing important at the end of

> the day. The world will not stop turning because

> anyone of us lives or dies.

------------------------------------------------


I TOTALLY agree!

I mean if it were like 8 or 9 people there is no way I'd do myself in for that!!

Anything over ten is cool though.

;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when push comes to shove most people would do anything to survive.

We live in a very insulated society and most people seriously believe that events like genocide happen to 'other people and not us'.

I'm not so certain how far we really are from all that.

We just kid ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My point is that it's only symbolic if you're not

> Catholic - it's still just bread and wine. Only

> Catholics suppose themselves to be eating the

> actual body and blood of Christ through the magic

> of transubstantiation.

______________________________________________


Add some cheese & a few "hail bloody marys" for a Sunday hangover picnic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These days I think it behoves us all to take along some Ryvita breakfast biscuits when travelling by plane over the Andes or hiking in the mountains, so that we don't HAVE to eat each other. That said, I don't think you can slit the jugular and drink the still-warm blood of a biscuit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bear Grylls could survive in the Andes if he was stranded.That pillock will eat anything.I saw one where he ate a live octopus and all it's gooey bits squirted out of his mounth as he chomped on it.I reckon he'd eat his own testicles if he had to.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm...how far would you go if alone, if with a loved one or with strangers...


If I knew there was no other option, I might consider cutting my arm off but being an optimistic type usually, I think I'd probably hope that someone did come along to my godforsaken spot and wait until I was too weak to actually survive cutting off my arm and die anyhow...


Plane-wise - I do count the seats to the emergency exit and if in a window seat with people who don't look like good survival candidates in the aisle rows, I have amused myself by figuring out the best route over the top of the seats to avoid being stuck behind them. :-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually in an air crash they are sweeping up tiny bits and pieces from a three mile radius, and in the case of the Lockerby crash it left a crater deep enough to drop a four storey block of flats.


The idea of hopping across the backs of seats to beat everyone to safety is unlikely.


When there is an investigation following a crash, most of the time is spent working out who died first and what the order of death came to the travellers for the sake of insurance companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
    • Another recommendation here for Jason.  He came to plaster over a section of ceiling that we had to remove in order to investigate a leak.  He is a really lovely guy, easy to get in touch with and great communication.  He was quick, tidy and competitively priced.  Very happy and I'd have no hesitation in recommending him to anyone.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...