Jump to content

SeanMaC


'bout now

Recommended Posts

He has more important priorities now. Time consuming one's I guess. Also one's that wont talk back........for a few years at least. Deactivation is a way to terminate something. Bit like giving up smoking.I could be completely wrong as I don't have any sources to confirm my theory.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has far more important things to do than

> faffing about on here now that he has become a

> father for the first time. End of.

> Move along now. Nothing hear to see.


He may be tempted back after a few months of sponging wee off walls and spending his sixtieth consecutive night at home in front of the television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, In between the periods of unmitigated joy and wonder etc etc there are regular occurrences of pure boredom.


And so, when it's only 9pm and you're watching yet another Grand Designs repeat, and an early night with TheMissus is still off the cards (on account of her only recently having her tuppence stretched to emit something the size of a very large grapefruit).. it's not inconceivable that he might grab and laptop and..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

).. it's not inconceivable that he might

> grab and laptop and..




.. when he's done with the porn he might post a message or two on here.


BOOM BOOM



Don't worry - he's not reading. Or is he..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does everyone really think that he had

> his account deactivated because he's incapable of

> juggling a child and occasionally surfing the

> internet?

>

>

yeah it's odd, there's passively not posting and then there's actively not posting


i thought that he was (probably, never met him) a decent bloke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...