Jump to content

Malumbu's own special thread.


SCSB79

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @#$%& @#$%&.



ha ha ha here I am, but off the game, sorry I lost the plot.

I am bored now.I'll be back again sometime during next season....:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seeing as he/she is so desperate for attention...

> chuck all comments in here.



(6) No guys you are wrong, poor little thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm...I think some of you are being a little harsh here. There is no forum rule (AFAIK) which says one cannot start several threads. In fact I think this thread is mean-spirited and should be deleted. What does it say about us?


Admin? Sean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm...I think some of you are being a little harsh

> here. There is no forum rule (AFAIK) which says

> one cannot start several threads. In fact I

> think this thread is mean-spirited and should be

> deleted. What does it say about us?

>

> Admin? Sean?


Sean? Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this thread, and encourage others to join in and give their views on Malumbu. I think he should live and let live, and if this is the death of grass routes football then so be it. I also think his stories are self indulgent, and at times patronising.


Finally he clearly should not be posting during the early hours or during the royal wedding.


Judging by the tone of his postings he well may have a neglected family.


You don't get this sort of debate allowed on SE23.com. The webmaster may have seen it as flippant and would have quickly deleted it and probably given Malumbu a red card. If of course he/she posted on SE23.com. Clearly Malumbu has a serious chip on his shoulder about our cousins on the overground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmmm...cheeky monkeys...

>

> Erm, Mr. H: I don't think multiple user names have

> been used on this thread by one person. Anyway...



No, Laddy Muck but I have pm you some doggy names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...