Jump to content

Antic pubs


StraferJack

Recommended Posts

Up on the (Crystal Palace) hill we have heard a rumour that the manager of the ED Tavern (as opposed to the Antic group themselves) has bought The Alma. The Alma still seems to be limping along though so it may be down to chinese whispers...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My local.


I actually really liked the Woodman in it's last incarnation. Nobody seems to be able to make the place work though, so bit of a risk.


Very pleased to hear this though, as I'd heard an estate agent had bought it and planned to turn it in to their new office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The old pub is definitely remaining a pub, but

> they are building flats and retail units. The

> people of Sydenham are getting jolly excited about

> rumours of a Waitrose coming to the site...


They ain't quite so happy about the Greyhound development at the mo:

http://sydenham.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=6589&p=51656#p51656

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Woodman has been acquired by Wooster Stock & the Greyhound is Sydenhams oldest pub I think.


Though I didn't know that the old post-office was going to be a pub, hopefully they'll keep the feel of the old place. I quite fancy queuing up for ages whilst one person serves at their own pace.


On a serious note, i've noticed a change along the new East London Line, in places like Brockley etc & it seems like it's spreading to Forrest Hill / Sydenham as well. I think the area as a whole needs a boost but things are changing for sure.


Fancy an ale down there when it opens SJ ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...