Jump to content

Prats in suits (Boris and Dave)


malumbu

Recommended Posts

Passed Traf Square today and had the fun of watching the Mayor and PM join in wheelchair tennis. Whilst I can make cheap shots at their expense until the cows come home, two questions:


1. Should they have at least taken their ties off, or probably put some sort of sports casuals on

2. Should they have sat in wheelchairs, as able bodied people often do, to experience what it is really like. A confident chuffer I knew was there and said that would have distracted from the two guys partnering them in wheelchairs.


I am not knocking the event (launch of Paralympics) of course.


3. Or should I get a life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Passed Traf Square today and had the fun of

> watching the Mayor and PM join in wheelchair

> tennis. Whilst I can make cheap shots at their

> expense until the cows come home, two questions:

>

> 1. Should they have at least taken their ties

> off, or probably put some sort of sports casuals

> on


Then someone would have criticised them for looking scruffy.


> 2. Should they have sat in wheelchairs, as able bodied people often do, to experience what it is

> really like. A confident chuffer I knew was there and said that would have distracted from the two

> guys partnering them in wheelchairs.


Then someone would have criticised them for not taking wheelchair sports seriously.


Really, whatever a politician does (or even most celebrities) they are going to be criticised by someone, somewhere for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would have been rather patronising for them to use wheelchairs. In no way does sitting in a wheelchair for 5 minutes let you experience what it is really like.


I think it's good that they're trying to raise the profile of paralympic sports, disappointing that people are putting a negative spin on it because you don't like them as politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's an old Tory divertion tactic: appear to support the disabled in public while cutting their

> disabled benefits.


Hooray! Always good to get the old political sloganeering out. I bet if you heard that they had turned down the opportunity to promote the paralympics you'd have stuck the boot in even harder.


Heads you win, tails you win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> Hooray! Always good to get the old political

> sloganeering out. I bet if you heard that they

> had turned down the opportunity to promote the

> paralympics you'd have stuck the boot in even

> harder.

Correct analysis. I am no tory, but it seems churlish in the extreme to criticise Dave and Boris for doing the right thing. All this tedious "Tory equals evil" and " labour equals evil" reductionism really belongs to a bygone era and merely serves to coarsen public debate.

>

> Heads you win, tails you win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UDT - a classic closed mind response to Northlondoner - "I'm right - you're wrong". A good balanced debate.


Have you looked at the work of Iain Duncan Smith's Centre for Social Justice - have you really listened to Damian Green's views, have you checked out the rationale behind Michael Gove's changes to schooling. You appear lost in the mythical past of a student selling the Socialist Worker - longing to cry "Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, Out, Out, Out" again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marmora Man, the arrogance of your last post stuns me.


The Tories have nicked the policies:


on schools from Sweden


on localism from the Labour party


on economics from the Canadians


Perhaps, Marmora Man, these policies are new to you and with your arrogance you think that nobody else doesn't know about them.


If you fully understood the Michael Gove's changes on schooling then you would realise it's a divide and conquer on the current schooling system with the ultimate goal in privatising schools for profits. Last week I was hearing Lord Willis, admittedly a Lib Dem, on the radio in my local barber and he was putting forward a case for running schools for profit.


I guess you take the attitude of I'm alright Jack as long as you keep your money in your pocket while kicking the undesireables such as disabled people when they are down. Same ole Tories.


I tell you what, why don't you spell out your rationale behind their policies and I'll give you mine. I think it's time I put an end to your arrogance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UDT - I am tempted to ignore your post. In responding to it I was criticising your apparent closed mind and kneejerk anti Tory reaction rather than necessarily defending or promoting Conservative policies.


I'm not quite sure why I am accused of arrogance - but perhaps it's your default criticism of anyone that indicates a degree of Conservative thinking or support for the right of centre view.


I note you haven't criticised the policies themselves - only the supposed fact that they were originally the policies of others. Of course the Conservative Party policies have a history - political ideas, policies and processes are memes - they evolve and change as they develop from tiny seeds of an idea somewhere, are modified and tested in discussions and debate, are tried in part in certain places, modified and evolve again and so on. To ignore successful ideas and policies would be to exhibit a closed mind, not something the Conservative party or the current Coalition is inclined to.


Michael Gove's Free Schools policy does, indeed, have its roots in Sweden. It also builds on the previous government's Academy programme. However, it also incorporates long standing Conservative beliefs in the power of education and its ability to free people from the shackles of poverty and deprivation. The latter element being a core belief of both Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Gove. To me that's good news - children, and society will benefit. I see no problem with this.


I am not sure why you decry the possibility of a school making a profit. Few, of any political persuasion, would argue that top private schools are not successful - in that the children lucky enough to be taught in them achieve high grades in exams, enjoy fantastic sports facilities and emerge as well read, articulate adults, ready to engage with the world. Just what we would wish all schools to deliver - yet private schools do so by generating a surplus of income over costs every year. They must do so, as they are charities and are not permitted to trade at a loss.


I am very relaxed (to borrow a New Labour phrase) about the possibility of schools making a profit just as long as they succeed in their core task of educating children well and effectively. Particularly, if the free schools can demonstrate the ability to provide high quality education at a lower cost than the current spending by LEAs and the Department of Education on what is, in too many cases, a poor education.


Labour and localism - this must be an ironic comment. The Blair / Brown administration was one of, if not the most, centralising in the political history of the last century. Personally, I doubt that the Conservative policy on localism will get as far as I would wish or that the party's rhetoric would have us believe. However, the direction of travel is correct and I wish it every success; it will be a tough policy to deliver. The ability of the government civil service to accrete power to the centre remains undiminished - and the current debate over devolving planning powers to a more local fora are an example of this tendency to belittle the ability of local communities to make their own decisions.


On economics - I wish the Coalition would follow the Canadian example - that restructuring of the government budget and spending was swift, ruthless and successful. Circumstances dictate that in UK such action is not, however desirable and necessary following a decade of irresponsible spending, possible - but George Osborne is doing reasonably well - now needs to get the growth element of the strategy working.


I'll now get back to my day job - which at present is developing a charitable outreach / satellite clinic for respiratory therapy services to NHS patients in SE London, Kent, Surrey and Sussex - a "good ole Tory" type of role.


Edited for spelling / grammar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MM, I was merely pointing out that Tory's policies were not original and I am convinced their thinking are one dimensional. No doubt I could easily cricise their policies but prefer to save that for later.


Labour and localism - this must be an ironic comment


Perhaps you've never followed what Labour were doing. Clearly you weren't aware of John Healy's work on the sub-national review. Nor were you aware of the work done by Hazel Blear, the former Communities Secretary of State, to decentralise government and her commitment to give the people more power. I suppose you don't know about Local Area Agreements either.


With regards to Michael Gove's Free Schools policies, even the Swedish ministers are saying that it wouldn't work in this country. But hey, it doesn't matter, since the Tory chums are licking their lips with the prospect of making more money at the detriment of children's education and taxpayers.


Again, it seems the Tories haven't thought through on the Canadian example since they haven't factored in growth and the world economic climate. Yes, the policies are hurting but they're not working.


The economic record of Labour's administration tends to be far better than the Tories since the second world war. Not sure why you thought Labour were irresponsible with spending when they have built new hospitals, schools and tackled urban decay. I suspect you call that irresponsible spending because of your greed for money in your pockets. Sod the nation as long as your pockets are full with money is what really matters to you.


I'm puzzled to why you think your day job is of any particular importance to me and a sign of good character. Let me remind you that Dr Harold Shipman was an NHS GP and look what he did to some of his patients!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A repetitive tried and tested cycle that seems to be slowing down in London thankfully. Brixton was the start. Councils consciously and purposely let an area decline until that area is next on the list for social and ethnic cleansing and ultimately gentrification. In come the first wave of arty/ creatives to squat and house share. A few coffee shops and cool but inexpensive cafe/ bars and art spaces open up. The crackheads, dealers and other assorted criminals who were once left to operate openly and brazenly to sell, shop lift, mug, beg, purchase,  publicly consume on decent folks doorsteps, stairwells,in bin sheds and without fear of the law begin to be targeted, rounded up and moved on. A few more jaunty and sustainable coffee shops/ bars appear . The Guardian and other facilitators in the media jump on the bandwagon, first claims of vibrancy are rolled out. Next step a few cool retro clothing shops pop up selling ' reclaimed Levi's for more than they originally cost and ten times the price of what the recently departed charity shop charged. Foxtons open a branch and the arty types and first wavers/ drivers have there first moan about there initially paltry rents going up. The guardian do a generic lets move to Brixton, Dalston, Hackney, Deptford, Walthamstow type double pager. Interview a graphic designer or two who have just bought a former crack den on the manor for next to peanuts. They will later bemoan the next wave who have more money than them. Cool, edgy and vibrant are now the buzzword bingo must use lingo. Few more coffee shops ( how original ) Pop up everything,. Organic and sour dough move in. The night time economy starts to thrive, more cool bars and eateries open. More squats and the last crack house that was once one of many are cleared out. Second wave is around the corner.   All of a sudden there's a visible police presence again and the streets are safe for fun seekers with plenty of disposable cash to chuck about on a dose of vibrancy with added coolness. By this stage even the locally brewed beer is organic. There's queues outside the newly arrived organic, sourdough, artisan and sustainable bakers. Instagram has Brixton trending. The greasy spoon of thirty year has gone cause the lease is up and the landlord has hiked the rents up by 60/70%. Followed by small family run independents that served the community  for decades and more.  The local characters, activists, eccentrics are getting less and less. There's a new show in town for a week or two and until the next brand arrives. Brewdog move in. Former job centres are converted into bars but peak edginess means it's still called the job centre. Followed by a couple more chain eateries. The resident DJ'S and music venues are replaced by another generic brand boasting guest chefs. The Guardian lifestyle section is now on it's fifth or sixth orgasm. Turn a few pages and hypocrisy is rampant with articles on the evils of gentrification, foxtons, capitalism, social cleansing and unaffordable housing. The middle classes continue to arrive in there droves to buy into the vibrancy and multiculturalism supposedly on offer. There isn't much multiculturalism going on at the packed latest place to eat, drink and fart. The multiculturalism on show comes in the form of bar staff, doorman and cheap as chips uber drivers and delivery workers. Rice and peas, jerk everything, red stripe at six quid a can from some hipster haunt that is currently flavour of the month and the place to be seen. The first wavers are now blaming the latest hedge funded brand that's pulled into town for driving gentrification and there soon to be hastened departure to be first wavers again somewhere else. Less cool but up and coming here we come. Covid has certainly helped/ been a factor in slowing down the process of gentrification. I also think it may be the driver for almost putting a stop to it. Remote working, less need to move to London to be near an office, less disposable cash, sky high rents, worthless degrees that relied on that disposable cash , different priorities, knife and gang crime and a large dose of much needed realism has put a huge spanner in the works for the shitty process and cycle that is/ was the gentrification and social cleansing of working class London. Manchester and Liverpool is next on the list for the planners. Thankfully.
    • Can you just queue up to withdraw cash or are other transactions like stamp purchasing required?  Do M&S do cash back?
    • Or don't stop using cash. Stop using your phone or even your watch as a banknote. At the same time avoid the risk of having your card cloned at cash points, by hand held card readers, oyster readers and point-of sale terminals to name a few. God only knows how much damage we're doing to the planet because all the above must require a hell of a lot of resources and juice from the grid. It won't happen though. I know of quite a few people who deem carrying cash about as a pain/ chore. But not a big lump of plastic with a screen and full of personal information that can be easily gleamed. I feel the same about carrying a phone about so i don't most of the time. I'll be in the minority but certainly don't see or treat a phone as a necessity.  You can't get a banknote out of your sky rocket with a phone in your hand. It's become a source of dopamine for many. It's an addiction for many. They're an easy target for thieves. They're a godsend to cyber fraudsters who are stealing billions and are doing so without the need of cash points.
    • There used to be an Osteopath at The Gardens (not physio) but they have since left.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...