Jump to content

Do you want your park turned into a burial ground?


QuornAgain

Recommended Posts

Southwark Council has said it's carrying out a borough-wide public consultation into whether residents want a long term policy that will mean the parks get turned into burial grounds - or not. Understand that a quesionnaire was supposed to be sent to households in the borough. Has anyone had one?


The Council gets a lot of short term income from turning parks into cemeteries. And a huge long term maintenance bill. But it doesn't have to offer land for burial plots at all. It could save the parks. The only duty is to provide cremation.


They've been eating away at Honor Oak Rec since 1991 - the last time they took a chunk they said it would last for 50 years, but they've come back again after just 9 years to take what's left of the park. When they took the last chunk, they were asked if they were thinking about taking other parks, and one of the senior managers said that Peckham Rye could be used.


First they came for Honor Oak Rec....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i filled out the petition online against the Honor Oak plan - it was on both Lewisham and Southwark council sites but I never saw it come through the door.


the problem with councils providing burial space is that it means no space then for the living to exercise and enjoy greenery. (outside of cemeteries!)


Look at a map and it's amazing how much space in a very small radius goes to Camberwell Old Cemetery, Camberwell New Cemetery, Nunhead Cemetery, Honor Oak, Ladywell and I'm probably forgetting others. Together they must be larger than all of the parks in the same area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it is worth recalling that the land was originally purchased and planned as a burial ground - it only became a recreation ground for the interim until demand required its use. In some ways an excellent example of long term planning on the part of the council back in the 50s (or perhaps earlier/later?).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...