Jump to content

Racist Bigot spouting bile on tram


Parkdrive

Recommended Posts

Has anybody seen the clip on youtube of a young woman with a young child spouting racist venom while on a tram. I feel for the child, and I don't know how this person wasn't beaten to a pulp. God above, if ever there was a case which proves the old adage that "theres more out than in" its her. Dreadful.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was on the telly. She's been arrested. So that's her dealt with.

Now the the thousands of others!


In a way it is a good thing the story happened because the fact we all saw it meant she could be identified.

Many is the time I have to go work in areas like Thamesmead or Bow or Kennington or Staines or somewhere and the racism is blatant and unapologetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

southmark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She wasn't beaten to a pulp because she had a

> defenceless child on her knees. I can't see any

> other reason?



Perhaps thats why she felt safe running off at the mouth the way she did? Who knows, but I really feel for that poor child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parkdrive> I don't know how this person wasn't beaten to a pulp

Salsaboy> I am also surprised she wasn't beaten to a pulp. She deserved it.

southmark> She wasn't beaten to a pulp because she had a defenceless child on her knees. I can't see any other reason?


What does beating a person to a pulp entail, and what sort of damage, temporary or permanent, results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Racism is brought about by Ignorance...


Beating someone up is also a product of Ignorance.


You cannot beat someone up just because they are Ignorant and you are in the right.


Otta.

White Trash could also be considered as a Racist remark, whoever is saying it..


You cannot fight racism with violence.


Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive> I don't know how this person wasn't

> beaten to a pulp

> Salsaboy> I am also surprised she wasn't beaten to

> a pulp. She deserved it.

> southmark> She wasn't beaten to a pulp because she

> had a defenceless child on her knees. I can't see

> any other reason?

>

> What does beating a person to a pulp entail, and

> what sort of damage, temporary or permanent,

> results?


I simply asked the question because that kind of behaviour usually results in someone taking revenge in some shape or form, I certainly wasn't advocating a good thumping.Just asking the question, no more no less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Based on the current state of things, I would also

> like to point out that, had the situation been

> reversed racially, I would be willing to bet a

> pretty penny that no legal actions would be taken.



I'd have to disagree with that, racism works both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I disagree. I can't find any evidence on this side of the pond, but the man (Kimg Samir Shabazz of the New Black Panthers) in this clip escaped prosecution in the States. He was the same man responsible for intimidating white voters at polling stations in Philidelphia. He escaped sanction on both occasions at the behest of the incumbent Attorney GeneraL Eric Holder.


If it were a black woman caught making racially aggravated remarks on public transport, I suspect it wouldn't attract nearly half the amount of media condemnation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

given that was the road you were travelling I joined in. Hopefully you can see it's pointless. The situation we have is what we see here - not some made up story. So probably best to stick with that


I agree with your point about here being drugged up tho - even more worrying for the kid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome back Claudia.


As even a retarded idiot knows, US freedom of expression laws make incrimination for inciting racial hatred a completely different issue in the US than in the UK.


That's such a stupid tenuous excuse to sustain and promote such an aggressive racial prejudice that it doesn't even deserve this correction.


You 'point out' nothing but reprehensible garbage. I hear John Tyndall calling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this woman. And although I share in her exarsperation, to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying what she said, where she said it. Because from where I'm sitting it looked as though the young man behind her was about to assault her.


And yes, she was clearly drunk or high. I suspect the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there is no record of the reverse (whatever that is, racist behaviour is racist behaviour surely) happening.

Given that CD's apparent indignation is nothing but unfounded speculation, the question remains can anyone condone this behaviour?


If not then there really is nothing to debate here.


I would agree she looked in something of a state, so I guess she's going to opt for the 'Galliano defence'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...