Jump to content

random stuff


El Pibe

Recommended Posts

I didn't really know where to put this, but wanted to share a joyous snippet of history


from this blog[/url]]Shortly after World War Two, the Italian cycling authorities introduced the Black Jersey, awarded, along with a cash prize, to the entrant who came last in each stage of the Giro d'Italia. This was partly to encourage the fans to identify with cyclists nearer their own level of skill and partly to encourage the crowds to hang around after the leaders had whizzed past. The shirts were black because the organisers wanted to mock Mussolini and the cult of victory associated with fascism.


It worked rather better than the organisers expected. Because an averagely skilled cyclist got nothing for not winning and a prize for coming last, a subcuture developed of black jersey specialists who would dawdle along, stopping in bars and restaurants on the way and hiding from each other in the hope that their competitors for the maillot noir would inadvertently pass them. The most famous of these, Luigi Malabrocca, was once discovered by a farmer hiding in his septic tank. Coming last was a serious matter.


As I said, the aim behind the Black Jersey was to encourage the public to identify with professional cyclists, and it worked. Malabrocca and his imitators had their own fans, who would stay at home when the leaders raced by and then come out three or four hours later to watch Luigi amble by, bearing banners with slogans reading 'Long Live Last Place'. "After asking who the leader was, the next question on people's lips was 'who has the black vest'" writes John Foot in Pedalare! Pedalare!, from where I'm taking this.


The practice ended after an epic struggle for last place fought between Malabrocca and his great rival Luigi Carollo in the 1949 Giro, which ended in utter defeat and victory for Carollo, who drew on truly superhuman reserves of patience to stroll in nine hours and 57 minutes after the stage winner. A more daring cycling administration might have seized the opportunity to restructure the entire race. But no, the black jersey was abolished, the cult of victory was reestablished without challenge and the way cleared for mass pharmaceutical enhancement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:-) Nine hours and 57mins is a sinch if you can stop off in bars etc, besides, that's a normal lunchbreak to an Italian ;-)..the challenge should have been that you had to stay on the bike with no stops and not veer off the course...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's very in-keeping with the spirit of that competition, you should definitely make it official, stopping off at the Great Exhibition, hiding in the bins of the evangelical church, snaffling a quick kebab at the chippie etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed EP, its very much in the spirit of the BBRR. It will nae doubt be awarded sometime after midnight on the 21st July. There are a lot of stops enroute.


Not officially organised (in keeping with the spirit of the BBRR) the HoT were going to knock up a Barry Barry Rum for the day. I could well seek refuge in there for a few hours prior to the finish line...The Barry Black T is in my sights!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In this age of instant gratification, just hand

> over the Black T to Jah, you know he's going to

> win it hands down...


Jah would never be seen dead in a Black T... oh... possibly if dead I suppose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the very slow updating of the news, and its text, how can it be perpetual "BREAKING NEWS" all night long and the next day.

Dont forget Holly wannabe advertising her twee dresses every day. free.

Good morning has become boring and miserable best to turn off than get the royal hump,or fed up with stupid cackling from both presenters

Bring back D.I.Y and does anyone remember two old scots women who could turn their hand to anything,cooking craft,painting and decorating they were very interesting to watch better than all these plastic celebs and barbie doll women.

The formats on these shows are tired now, and i wish someone would stop Davina Mcall shrieking stupid girl. T.V. oh

dont get me started. Celebs rule. Harry styles Jagger for instance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And - as if by magic - a potential thread of quirky delights is magically transformed into a banal moan-a-thon.



No, really - tell me more of your thoughts RE the current state of daytime television. Light up my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And - as if by magic - a potential thread of

> quirky delights is magically transformed into a

> banal moan-a-thon.

>


very nice but you only get it now if you order the bang tuk sit-down menu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > In this age of instant gratification, just hand

> > over the Black T to Jah, you know he's going to

> > win it hands down...

>

> Jah would never be seen dead in a Black T... oh...

> possibly if dead I suppose.


I'm wearing one right now actually. I've quite a few as it happens. Useless information I know, but it may be helpful to someone. Who knows? I was born to lose or in this case win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if this counts, but a couple of days ago I read a news story about a 29-year-old woman who was (I think) working as a call girl to fund a degree at Westminster University and who had been found guilty of evading ?120,000 of tax despite being able to afford a ?110,000 deposit on a ?360,000 flat on the Brompton Road in Chelsea.


I noticed that my main reaction was, 'that flat must be the size of a shoebox'. My second was, 'like a degree from Westminster is going to improve on those earnings'.


I think my moral compass is broken (or maybe I'm just worn out by all the politician/banker/media finger-pointing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't know if this counts, but a couple of days

> ago I read a news story about a 29-year-old woman

> who was (I think) working as a call girl to fund a

> degree at Westminster University and who had been

> found guilty of evading ?120,000 of tax despite

> being able to afford a ?110,000 deposit on a

> ?360,000 flat on the Brompton Road in Chelsea.

>

> I noticed that my main reaction was, 'that flat

> must be the size of a shoebox'. My second was,

> 'like a degree from Westminster is going to

> improve on those earnings'.

>

...Not to mention the huge drop-off in earnings she could expect if she'd applied to somewhere like Keele...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the plus side, though, she could probably afford a detached house up there.


Where is Keele exactly?*




(*Traditional response)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...