Jump to content

Urgent temporary accommodation


editorialmoo

Recommended Posts

Hiya,


I met a family with a 1 year old boy about to sleep on the street in Peckham last night. I managed to help them get a room for the night through Wandsworth Council but every council is saying it's not their responsibility to help them.


They are currently at the Southwark housing place in Peckham but I'm worried if they won't help them they'll try and sleep on the streets again and it was not a good situation last night.


Does anyone know of any cheap temporary accommodation near us? Are there any hostels? Emergency rooms? Houses with multiple occupants who will let people stay for a week or so ( they have a little bit of money I think.)


Please text or message me 07791 765 456.


Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is because they were living in Luton, got made redundant in Luton and kicked out of their house in Luton so Southwark are saying they have no connection with Southwark and are therefore not eligible. It is my understanding that Southwark are obliged to help them whilst they sort it out but they are saying no. Also, they do have some connection with Southwark who were paying their housing benefit in Colliers Wood. It's very complicated clearly but I do believe Sputhwark are responsible for finding emergency accommodation whilst they sort it out. Southwark however do not seem to see it like that.


All I know is that it's not safe for a 1 year old baby to sleep In the streets in Peckham judging by the characters who were already circling when I found them yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it is absolutely not safe, but there would be a reason that Luton council are not helping them?


It sounds more complicated. Were they in default to Luton Council rent, which is why Luton evicted them? That would make them homeless by their own actions and they would need to apply for emergency housing based on the fact they have a minor.


Have they spoken to a Southwark councillor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They haven't spoken to a Southwark Councillor that I know if. Can you suggest anyone?


I think if they'd stayed in Luton they would have been given emergency shelter but I think they came to London because they thought the dad would have a better chance of finding work and had already had dealings with Southwark. It is true that they haven't done what's required but they didn't seem to understand the system.


They all have EU passports but the level of English is poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Frank Field -  a decent politician.   Frank Field, Baron Field of Birkenhead - Wikipedia
    • The alternative would be to let them free, to be predated on and without parents to teach them the necessities of survival. Clearly this is an unhelpful model of instruction, but, given the ducklings have been born and will not survive without parental care (unless they are hand reared in the school - which I doubt has the capacity of skill for this) then gassing them is the most 'humane' action. The school should perhaps have thought through what is the likely outcome for ducklings which are not being reared by either skilled farmers or ducks. I suspect that the duckings would not be saleable to farmers having been initially born and raised in circumstances which were not sterile for introduction into larger flocks. 
    • That's a good idea smiley blue , if you or anyone else comes across petitions to end these despicable acts of cruelty to defenceless animals please put on here or start a new thread if you please so we can sign the petition and add our objections to this , I would also like to thank all of you the people for reading these messages and adding your voices to this cruelty,  maybe we can end it 
    • Malumbu, by that measure are police efforts to cut down on anti-social driving by issuing tickets and fines a token effort as well? Surely punitive measures for cyclists breaking the rules will encourage them not to break the rules again? A bit like when you got stopped and taken into the cab of an HGV. The police are currently using that tactic to show those who break the rules cycling that it might lead them to being hit by a lorry due to the driver's having limited vision - the cycling equivalent of a speed awareness course for drivers.    When they stopped you was it because you had broken a rule or was it just more of an education programme and they asked you to take a look and did it change your cycling behaviour in any way? As I said previously there are those who break the rules on cycling out of ignorance (and those out of arrogance) and I am sure they are using HGVs to educate those in the ignorance category and then hitting those in the arrogance category with the PCNs.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...