Jump to content

Large 1 bedroom flat - Southampton Way


thefords

Recommended Posts

Flat 103 - SE15/SE5 Peckham Grove off Southampton Way SE15/SE5 near Burgess Park


Flat 103 South City Court is large spacious 1 bedroom flat in block of 80 flats built 15 years ago modelled on the factory building that once stood in its place. It benefits from high ceilings, large factory style windows for a cool urban style and plenty of natural daylight.


It has a separate large living room with space for dining, large double bedroom, kitchen and bathroom. It is a furnished flat with fully fitted kitchen with washing machine, dishwasher, fridge/freezer and microwave. There are flooring is a mixture of hardwood flooring, tiles and carpet and was fully redecorated last year.


The flat is situated at the end of a hallway so it is quiet. The block is friendly with working professionals, young families and long term owner/occupiers so it is well maintained. It is serviced with weekly rubbish collections and its own recycling unit.


Transport links are good - there is a bus outside the building which is 15 mins to Elephant & Castle tube and London Bridge. Peckham Rye overground is 20 min walk with connections to Victoria, London Bridge and Waterloo.


Situated on the border of Peckham and Camberwell there is plenty to do in the area with bustling shops, cafe and bars of Rye Lane/Bussey Building in Peckham and Burgess Park just 5 mins away.


For ?100 per month there is a secure gated car park space available with the flat.


Available to let from 20th April.


?1200 per month includes service charge and water (?237.87) excludes bills - electric heating, council tax, phone/internet.


6 weeks deposit and references required. No smoking, no pets, 1 year minimum contract.


Please PM for viewings and more pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...