Jump to content

For Sale: Collection of Trainers/ Shoes - Diff sizes


Denfra

Recommended Posts

I have a collection of trainers/shoes that my daughter has outgrown. List/pricing and a photo of the collection below. Let me know if you want to see more photos


Nike Jordans - Red - UK 5.5 - ?10 - Excellent condition

Hide & Squeak Pink Mary Janes - UK 7 - ?8 - Excellent condition

Hide & Squeak Brown Mary Janes with pink bow - UK 8 - ?8 - Excellent condition - SOLD

Adidas Forest Hills White with yellow soles - UK 7 - ?8 - Great condition

Nike Black Airmax 95 - UK 7 - ?10 - Excellent condition

Converse Black/Purple Double Tongued shoes - UK 5 - ?8 - Great condition

Red Vans - UK 5.5 - ?8 - Good Condition

Vans Half Crib - Black Paisley - limited edition - UK 7 - ?10 - Excellent condition

Nike Blazers (boots) Light grey with purple tick - UK 7.5 - ?5 - Reasonable condition

Nike Blazers (shoe) Navy with pink tick - UK 6 - ?5 - Good condition

Nike Jordans Black with Grey/black pattern at edging - UK 7.5 - ?8 - Excellent condition

M&S Fuchsia walking boots - UK 6 - ?8 - Good condition

Timbaland Pink Sandals - UK 5 - ?8 - Brand New

Mothercare Pink Walking Shoes - UK 3 - ?4 - Excellent condition

TU Black Shoes with Pink Butterflies - UK 5 - ?3 - Excellent condition


All from a smoke/pet free home. Collection from Forest Hill, SE23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...