Jump to content

REDUCED For sale: Slumber Bunny womb sounds soft toy, to help newborns sleep


gracemolly

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I have this for sale -


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Prince-Lionheart-Sleep-Tummy-Bunny/dp/B00RQIXGX2


As quoted - 'The best just got better with Slumber Bunny. The ONLY audiopacifier with an actual recording made inside a mother's womb. In addition to the womb sound that lulls babies to sleep in minutes, additional features are: Lullabies Ocean Waves White Noise Recordable function allows parents to create their own 15 minute long soothing message or baby's favourite sound. Helps promote parent and baby bonding. NEW Remote Control NEW 15 Minute Auto Shut-off with standby mode (previously 5 minutes). NEW USB Charger. No more batteries!'


This has barely been used, has just been hanging on the side of the cot, it hasn't been cuddled or sucked (!) so it looks and feels like new. Toy is washable as electronic element is removable.


I liked the idea of recording a lullaby on this but just never got round to it! My baby is too old for this now so I'd like it to go to a new home and be loved.


Collection from SE22. Bought this for ?35, would like ?15 please. REDUCED - happy to take ?10, want it to go to a good home.


Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...