Jump to content

Please don't bump posts


Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Time for a friendly reminder not to bump posts please. This is a fast moving board, and it's not fair for posts to be pushed down by people bumping up their posts daily (i.e., "still available" the day after first posting it). I have had to hide about 20 posts so far today from people doing exactly this, and to be honest I have better things to do!


Repeat offenders will receive an email from me. Continuing to break the rules will result in a ban.


Thank you for your understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
  • 2 years later...

renarde Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> please tell me how i get a red "new"mention when i

> do a fresh posting. Thank you!!!!

>

> annie


This function is an automatic one, however you will never see "new" beside your own posts, only those of other people. Yours will show as new to other users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Yes it would be really useful to know when it?s acceptable to bump a post by adding a STILL AVAILABLE. 2 weeks?


Thanks


Loucpearls Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it okay to bump if post has been up for more

> than two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • My son’s primary school hatched duck eggs, probably under this scheme around 12 years ago.  We were all very upset to hear that 2 of the (5 year old) boys had knocked the incubator over & all eggs smashed.   feeling a lot less sad about that now!  
    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...