Jump to content

trunkis - from what age?


Recommended Posts

We have found mixed response with them, my eldest was 6 when he got one and loved it, used it at the airport using his feet to push himself along at quite a speed, and he also loved the fact he could put all his junk.....sorry toys in it for the flight. Our 3 year old at the time liked the idea but wouldn't sit on it, so we had to carry and since then he still hasn't taken to it so I don't bother bringing for him anymore when we go away, as one more thing for us to end up carrying!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had one and ended up selling it, as found it a complete pain! Bulky, difficult to get things out of in flight (and that was on long haul flights to NZ where you get a bit more room than usual), and if your child doesn't want to ride on it they are a nuisance to carry (we found it was too bulky to hang on the buggy). I wouldn't rush to get one!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awful things, in my opinion! Too bulky and too hard to get things in and out of, a rucsack is much better. If the child rides on it through the airport it uses up one of your hands, and the child gets tripped over by other passsengers. 2 year olds will get tired of pulling it along, and yes, you will end up carrying it, along with everything else.


And they are so expensive.


One of those twee ideas that is awful in practical terms, in my experience travelling with a friend whose child had one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our two year old loves it. It's handy for the long walk to the baggage reclaim when you haven't yet got the buggy-pulling her along is far easier than trying to carry her or walk at snails pace with her. I stick nappies,spare clothes,doll and sticker books in it. Not difficult to carry-it slings over my shoulder and we never fill it to very heavy-also straps go over back of buggy no problem. I think it's great, and provides some entertainment. Was a present so cost didn't really come into it for us. Airports are so boring its good to have some distractions to hand. But the majority above dont seem to have much love for them!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for all the advice. aside from shaunag its a pretty damning report of trunkis, I was surprised! I think we'll leave it for this holiday (as I think she's a little too young still to be expected to hold on the whole time), but maybe i'll roadtest one next time around! thanks again!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...