Jump to content

Interesting article


stacker285

Recommended Posts

That is interesting.


I read the "French children don't throw food" book (well most of it) since that, initially, was exactly the sort of child I quite wanted: one who could sit quietly in a cafe or restaurant; one who would happily play with on their own initiative and who was well behaved in public.


I'm not sure I would have ever used the word obedient, mind you. Nor would I ever resort to corporal punishment to instill that behaviour.


Likewise, as a child, teen and adult I would want my son not to accept the status quo, challenge authority and follow their own minds rather than be swayed by the opinions of others.


Unlike this artile though, I'd don't see those as opposing positions. Mind you, I have no idea how to reconcile them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with some of this article, but it's quite an interesting read and it did make me think.


This paragraph in particular annoyed me though:


A compliant child becomes a particular concern, Kohn admits, when they reach adolescence. "If they take their orders from other people, that may include people we may not approve of. To put it the other way around: kids who are subject to peer pressure at its worst are kids whose parents taught them to do what they're told.


I think this is untrue, but I only have my own experience to draw from I suppose?


I was fairly strict with my son while he was growing up, friends used to remark on it (but the same friends who'd bribe their children with sweets, and at 17, my son has never had a filling), but also everyone would agree that my son had lovely manners and was a joy to be around as he was always smiling and pleasant.


He did as he was told, but that didn't make him an obedient puppy, and there were times when he rebelled during his teens. The only real teenage rebellion kicked in last year when he turned 16. This was, mercifully, short lived.


My son's secondary school was fairly rough in comparison to the schools we have in East Dulwich (after we moved out of the area he decided that he didn't want to leave the school), but he never adapted his accent to match his peers, or limited his vocabulary in any way. He's never been into fashion labels, never followed the crowd, has very eclectic music tastes, thinks for himself and is very imaginative and confident around adults as well as his own age group.


As he's got older I've given him more freedom and responsibility. But when he was a lot younger I made all the decisions for him (I don't believe in letting young children make decisions as I think it's unfair to put that much pressure on them... they should be allowed to be free from having to make choices and just enjoy being children and letting adults decide where they go, what they eat... etc...).


At home he helps out, he has his own chores (unpacking and repacking dishwasher, cat litter, hoovering up, washing his clothes, collecting the vegetable bag etc...), that doesn't make him 'obedient', he's just playing his part in the family.


I have another child on the way, due in a few months and I'm not sure how I'll be this time round parenting-wise. I suspect I'll be more laid back, but then again I'm really happy with how my son has turned out! As I had my son so young my parenting style was very similar to that of my parents... but with more compassion and a focus on honesty and talking things through. We do a lot of talking. My son and I are we're extremely close - to the point that I have to remind him that I'm his mother and don't need to know *all* the details of the fun he's had with his girlfriend!


Anyway, have rambled on here a bit. I just think that the 'obedient' label in itself a bit insulting, especially in the context of this article. A child doing what its parent tells it to (most of the time) doesn't imply that it lacks imagination or drive, or that it'll go through life thoughtlessly following the herd. Instead it's rather that it recognises there are rules and boundaries in place, most of which are set out for their own protection.


Tara

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...