Jump to content

Chicken Pox Party


Recommended Posts

My friends toddler (21 months) has the pox, I have heard mixed reviews on if before 2 the pox will reappear later in life - just wanted to hear people's opinions when their child had it, we are due to go away in a month so I think now is a bad time for my son to get it as he turns 2 in June, would be happy to hold a pox party or wondering if anyone else had been to one or has views it's so mixed when I talk to people

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but I just find it strange to deliberately try to get your child sick...I haven't looked into this specifically, but I had chicken pox at 10 and it was miserable. I would avoid my 18 month old getting it if I could!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but that's the point devsdev it is miserable to get it when you are older. And worse still to miss getting it altogether and then get it whilst pregnant. Mine have so far missed it but we have been in contact with children with pox (intentionally and unintentionally) the most contagious time is just before the spots appear though so that's tricky.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please find attached info: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/chickenpox/Pages/Introduction.aspx


I found this very useful. My son has just had it 18 months (caught it at nursery). He had a lot of spots, but did not suffer in any other way apart from lack of appetite. No itching at all. Before he had it I thought he might be too young to cope with it, but I do actually think he coped better than if he would have caught it being at an age when he would have been aware of the spots. At this age you are also able to use bodies to avoid them being able to get direct contact with the skin and scratch areas such as the stomach and back. Both of which are prone to be have most spots. However everyone is different and it is very hard to tell how they will cope. My advice is to do what feels right for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it is possible to have chickenpox a number of times - my hisband had it when he was an infant and again at 23 and it was horrible. The main reason that the vaccination isn't widely offered is because it only provides limited immunity and it could increase the risk of chickenpox and shingles in older people. Well that and it's only a mild illness in childhood. Don't know if I'd deliberately want my son to catch it; I'd rather not know beforehand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My son who turned four a few weeks back caught it 5 days before his birthday party. Cue: nightmare of texting all invitees informing them of the situation. Luckily most had had it (it had been going round his nursery) or didn't mind if theirs caught it. My daughter, 20 months, got it soon after and wasn't too ill with it. In a way I'm glad it's out of the way and glad they didn't get it before a holiday where we'd potentially have to cancel it. Although I do know some kids who've had it twice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five to six days of being contagious - so the spots have appeared and haven't crusted over until the end of this period. Cola babe, I think the incubation period is 21 days, and they are the most contagious 2 days before the spots appear. But if your little one has past this stage I would suggest that it is best to try not to expose your child to it as if my son (now 4) was just under 2, I think I would try for him not to get it. It's only now that I have two kids that I was less bothered about the second one getting it. Ie, better to get it out of the way in one go rather than be housebound for another week in the future. Good luck!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

colababe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought once you get it you can never get it

> again? I would rather he had it now than when he

> is 10 ?


No, some people do get it twice. There is though to be a genetic susceptibility to repeated varicella infection. Also, there may be a genetic susceptibility to severity, which can override effects of age. Also the "rule" about age-related severity is HIGHLY variable.


The chicken pox vaccine is still effective if given 3-5 days post exposure. South London Travel Clinic are offering it. They're very nice, and the jab is only a tiny one. xx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my colleagues and his partner had a child later in life and he caught shingles when the child had chicken pox. He was off work for 3 months. Also, people on a course of steroids are more susceptible to catching the virus and they have to be notified.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had chicken pox twice. My poor son though had scarlet fever a month or so before chicken pox, which was nothing in comparison. Another friend's child was in hospital for weeks with it as she got it so severely. Nasty virus.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One of my colleagues and his partner had a child

> later in life and he caught shingles when the

> child had chicken pox. He was off work for 3

> months. Also, people on a course of steroids are

> more susceptible to catching the virus and they

> have to be notified.


There is a shingles vaccine now too. The NHS is introducing it on a rolling schedule, but you can also have it privately if you don't (yet) qualify for the NHS shingles vaccine. xx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, unless you quarantine your child for the entire 20+ day incubation before spots appear, you'll have no way of knowing if your child is spreading the infection in the community, including spread to children too young to be immunised. Children are most contagious prior to the appearance of illness. :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughter is 5 and still hasn't had Chickenpox. Could she of had it without me noticing? She's been around outbreaks but never caught it. She's a severe eczema sufferer so I think at some point we may not of noticed she had it. Last year she had what was diagnosed finally as scalded staph but looked like measles, but not chicken pox.


At what point does it become more risky for your child to catch it? 5, 10, 15?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother didn't have it until he was 18 yo, despite having been exposed several times. This is not uncommon.


There's no definitive cut off for severity risk. There's a relative trend with MANY exceptions.


If she's had severe eczema, you might have a case for having her immunised on the NHS. (Definitely don't take her to a CP party.) But otherwise the jab is not expensive. xx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got my 6 yo and 3 yo vaccinated recently. Both had been exposed multiple times but not caught it and I felt it was better to make sure that they wouldn't get it later on. Judging by friends' experiences, it can be pretty miserable for child and parents even if it is not a particularly serious case. In lots of countries it is on the general vaccination schedule.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

both mine had it under 3 and didn't suffer that much. bur other friends' kids did. i had it at a child - via a cp party! - and had shingles in later life too. my friend had it in adulthood but not that bad. it all seems quite individual.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...