Jump to content

Harris Free School Primary on Hospital Site


Lou

Recommended Posts

Dear Michael Gove


It's this simple. We need a co-ed secondary school for East Dulwich. We don't need another primary, thanks very much. The hospital site is the only site.


Please do as Tessa asks and listen to the community.


Yours


Everyone who has been backing the ED Secondary school campaign (more than 600 local families and counting)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well how depressing! Harris seem to have moved in and secured the site with no consultation what so ever - pouring cold water over all the work of local parents to get a new secondary school for the area. So we will have a zillion new primary schools and no new secondary school.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Beth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well how depressing! Harris seem to have moved in

> and secured the site with no consultation what so

> ever - pouring cold water over all the work of

> local parents to get a new secondary school for

> the area. So we will have a zillion new primary

> schools and no new secondary school.



Was wondering about the 'consultation' bit. Will be an interesting bun fight if they go up against such strong local wishes (based on consultation with local families) for a secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think like many things Gove is involved in - he's got this wrong. I think he's talking about the Nunhead Harris primary that's going to take over the police station in September 2015. The dates mentioned, the name, the trajectory all are weirdly the same as the planned Harris primary which was approved in Feb 2014 to be housed in Harris girls then moved to old police station, LL in September 2015. Let's hope so before Harris takes over the world.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Harris website, the Nunhead primary is additional to the ED primary

http://www.harrisfreeschooleastdulwich.org.uk/50/academy-news/article/11/building-announced-for-new-harris-primary-school-in-east-dulwich


'?When the petition for the new school in East Dulwich was put together by Cllr Barber, there was so much support that it justified a new school for the Nunhead area. This was approved last week and will open in September 2015.?'


Does this mean that Harris, as part of the discussions about the ED Primary, went on to arrange to open a second free school, and got it approved, without any further discussion or consultation with the community? And pinched the hospital site, as a done deal, in the process? It appears so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James must know about this, he is quoted in that article on the Harris website, about the two new schools. And it was the original gathering of names for the first school http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1011288,page=12 that ended with so many more than the 80 needed for Harris ED. If the number really did end up at '145/80 + 100' then you can see what's happened. And the hospital site was one of the sites looked at for the ED primary wasn't it. I guess both sites, the police station and the hospital were available and so a further free school application was put in and approved in wave 5. The ED primary was approved in wave 4. They are definitely two separate schools, according to the published free school approvals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. James says 'The Dulwich Hospital site is the only Dulwich land with sufficient space for a secondary school. A secondary school would still leave plenty of space for the proposed primary school and proposed medical facilities.'


So it looks like there was always a plan for a primary there, as well as the secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to be a very small health site then? This is madness, the public have not been listened to and if every school in the area is to run by Harris whatever happened to parental choice?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this school is to serve nunhead and it is going to be in east Dulwich it will create more traffic at start and end of school day. How can the children get to school without a car? Will it exclude nunhead children without access to a car? East Dulwich grove is being converted to 20 mph zone as we speak. We need less traffic not more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...