Jump to content

Is your primary school turning into an exam factory?


echo

Recommended Posts

Yup. When I went to the ciriculum meetings the teachers (I presume in inner London) not massive fans of the Govt seemed actually quite enthused as they had targets (as before) but much more freedom on how to reach them rather than the perscriptive version before Gove's reforms.That's what I heard anyway??? I guess some are intimidated by this 'freedom' so what DaveR said.


Basically the evidence of the much needed educational reforms started by New Labour are working very well now especially in London.........good old Jezza of cousrse would throw this all away on ideological grounds. Good old idealsitic Jezza.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the new emphasis on grammar in literacy rather depressing - and I'm actually an editor, so I do care about grammar! But when my 8-year-old daughter comes home talking about fronted adverbials and embedded clauses, it makes me want to weep. Mind you, she seems perfectly happy about it (she's a bit geeky), but I fear for the kids who are put off literacy for life as a result of all this clunky emphasis on the nuts and bolts of language. I do feel that at primary school the focus should be on getting kids to stretch their imagination and come up with wild and creative stories rather than ticking off a list of ploddy grammatical learning objectives in every bit of writing. I'm not knocking the school at all - I think they do a decent job of making it interesting - but the emphasis seems skew-whiff to me. Surely you want to get kids loving reading and writing for its own sake before you start on the deconstructing and labelling?


As you might be able to tell, I'm a product of 1980s state education where we weren't taught grammar at all - I had to pick it up myself later when I was learning French and later still at uni studying English, which I admit brought its own problems. But overall I'm glad I came to it after I'd already established a love of reading. I worry that for some kids this change in the curriculum will have the opposite effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

redjam, I have to admit having to do a quick (and sneaky) google when attempting to help my daughter with her literacy homework, I had no idea what a fronted adverbial was! I'm a product of 1980's kiwi schooling, definitely not something that we were taught!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find the new emphasis on grammar in literacy

> rather depressing - and I'm actually an editor, so

> I do care about grammar! But when my 8-year-old

> daughter comes home talking about fronted

> adverbials and embedded clauses, it makes me want

> to weep. Mind you, she seems perfectly happy about

> it (she's a bit geeky), but I fear for the kids

> who are put off literacy for life as a result of

> all this clunky emphasis on the nuts and bolts of

> language. I do feel that at primary school the

> focus should be on getting kids to stretch their

> imagination and come up with wild and creative

> stories rather than ticking off a list of ploddy

> grammatical learning objectives in every bit of

> writing. I'm not knocking the school at all - I

> think they do a decent job of making it

> interesting - but the emphasis seems skew-whiff to

> me. Surely you want to get kids loving reading and

> writing for its own sake before you start on the

> deconstructing and labelling?

>

> As you might be able to tell, I'm a product of

> 1980s state education where we weren't taught

> grammar at all - I had to pick it up myself later

> when I was learning French and later still at uni

> studying English, which I admit brought its own

> problems. But overall I'm glad I came to it after

> I'd already established a love of reading. I worry

> that for some kids this change in the curriculum

> will have the opposite effect.



Yup - but the school can also foster a love of reading and problem solving and creating and all kinds of things and many do. I hated hearing all that guff from my primary school child but, what's interesting in secondary is that all that constant analysing and trying to demonstrate knowledge and tricks and turns of language seems to have left her with a more well developed awareness of language as a construction rather than a "natural" thing. So she's wiser to adverts and their persuasive language and seems more adept at shifting between registers in her own writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's very reassuring, bawdy-nan, and I certainly hope that will be the case for my own kids. I suppose I worry that this grammatical approach might be a massive turn-off for those kids who don't naturally enjoy reading in the first place. I guess we won't know if that's the case for several more years, until the 'Gove generation' has gone up through the education system.


I also find the re-introduction of Imperial measures into the maths curriculum quite weird. On the other hand, I rather like the fact that primary school kids are now expected to be able to recite a poem - yes, it's an old-fashioned skill, but one I'm quite happy to see revived.


Overall, though, I do pity the teachers trying to wade their way through all these reforms - must be a nightmare. And no one seems to have a very good idea of how these level-free Sats are going to work in reality...


(Edited to add: Pickle, I've got an English degree and been a book editor for over twenty years and I had no idea what a fronted adverbial was either! Which is why in the end it seems like an utterly pointless thing to drum into an eight-year-old's head, but hey ho.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Yup - but the school can also foster a love of

> reading and problem solving and creating and all

> kinds of things and many do. I hated hearing all

> that guff from my primary school child but, what's

> interesting in secondary is that all that constant

> analysing and trying to demonstrate knowledge and

> tricks and turns of language seems to have left

> her with a more well developed awareness of

> language as a construction rather than a "natural"

> thing. So she's wiser to adverts and their

> persuasive language and seems more adept at

> shifting between registers in her own writing.



It is also important for the age they are growing up in with social media,internet and the majority of interactions being text based


And when they teach the "names" of grammar parts from an early age our children grow up unphased by it,it becomes innate knowledge. Unlike the way we were schooled. Judging our children's education by our own knowledge / education doesn't help.


But then I don't "help" my children with homework...I facilitate and nudge them and help them find their own answers if required ...seems to help them become self-motivators ...if they fail it's on them and the teacher knows what they can do, not what I can do...that said I don't believe in homework in early years beyond reading for pleasure, and neither do the best teachers I've known ...many say homework is due to parental pressure not need

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Available from Monday April 8th 2024, 2on2Walkies take pride in doggie care and only walk 2 furry friends at a time. I make sure that they get plenty of doggie interaction and socialisation in the park as well as making friends. Back home happy and tired I always check that the water bowl has fresh water and always make sure the doggie is left comfortable before I leave. I'm fully insured and have a couple of slots available for local walks to either Peckham Rye Park or Dulwich Park.  Thank you!  
    • Why would they only send them recorded delivery? I used the signed for option yesterday.
    • > however I know I will have to prove it and provide a receipt,  both I can't provide. So what leads you to say that the dustmen have done damage to it? 
    • Prayed in aid?!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...