Jump to content

Parents Defending Education - South London: Parents and Teachers Event


Recommended Posts

Hello East Dulwich Parents - we need your power now!


A group of concerned local parents and teachers have set out to create an event in South London that aims to help further inform people (including ourselves) about the changes and challenges facing our schools.


We have organised a 'Parents Defending Education - South London: Parents & Teachers Event' and I wanted to see if I could encourage you all to come so we can get informed and involved together. Please spread the word to other parents you know too. All are welcome. We want it to be as lively, information rich and well attended as possible.


Thursday 16 June at 8pm at effraspace, 21 Effra Parade, London SW2 1PX


Here is a link to the Facebook event page which it would be wonderful if you could click if you will attend and share:


https://www.facebook.com/events/250401915318081/permalink/250500468641559/


The event has been created as an opportunity for parents to meet with teachers, share information and hear first hand the challenges and concerns facing our education system. In the last few weeks the media has been full of stories about the government's plans for schools but what will this mean for your child and school? Today 8 Lambeth schools received letters in their book bags saying that academisation was now on the cards. Your school may have been one of these or be next?


Hopefully the event will give you the opportunity to:


Discover more about how local schools are run and how this might change in the future? Academisation is still a route many schools may take - forced or not.


Understand what teachers and fellow parents really feel about SATs and the increasingly onerous regime of Primary testing.


Get to grips with how the governments funding freeze will be effect class size, number of teachers and assistants and support services.


Out of the meeting we hope to be able to agree what a campaign directed to government might look like, how to support teachers / schools further and what action we might want to take in our own school - at the very least discuss what questions we should all be asking?


We are very pleased to have received the backing of the NUT for our meeting. The meeting will be free and drinks and nibbles will be on offer.


Good campaigns to check out if you want more information are:


‪#‎letkidsbekids‬ ‪#‎parentsagainstforcedacademies‬ ‪#‎parentsdefendingeducation‬


Let's remember that our schools don't belong to the government. Our schools belong to our children, to the community, to the parents, to the teachers and support staff and to future generations.


Many thanks all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This all sounds very reasonable - concerned local parents, get informed etc. Isn't it actually just the Anti-Academies Alliance, by another name? Which in turn is a movement dominated by teaching and other public sector unions, with no interest in anything other than knee-jerk opposition to anything that disturbs their vested interests?


If you're appealing for people to join your (political) cause, just say so - don't dress it up as something else (however ineptly)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Just to clairfy I can tell you now this meeting has been organised by a collection of local parents across a range of primary schools including very concerned parents with children in the 8 Gipsy Hill Federation primaries who are under threat of academisation. We want to defend education as a public service and open up a discussion about the fundamental changes that our government are proposing. Do feel free to come as we want a full exploration of all views.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Do feel free to come as we want a full exploration of all views."


But do you, really?


"Parents Defending Education" - from whom? Or is that something still to be decided?


"Out of the meeting we hope to be able to agree what a campaign directed to government might look like" - but there's definitely going to be campaign directed at government, right?


"We are very pleased to have received the backing of the NUT for our meeting" - have you checked with them whether they are interested in a 'full exploration of all views'? My view is that the NUT represent a significant threat to further improvement in schools - can we explore that?


"Let's remember that our schools don't belong to the government. Our schools belong to our children, to the community, to the parents, to the teachers and support staff and to future generations." My view is that this is meaningless, pointless nonsense - the real question is who should run schools, and in particular how to manage the tricky balance of power between govt (central and local), the management and governors of individual schools (and increasingly those of academy chains), and others, in particular whoever is carrying out the supervisory/quality control function, be it Ofsted or whoever. My sense is that this (serious and difficult) issue is one you're not interested in grappling with.


'Parents Defending Education' = simplistic nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with DaveR on this point..

'Isn't it actually just the Anti-Academies Alliance, by another name? Which in turn is a movement dominated by teaching and other public sector unions,...'

And the fact that the NUT is backing your meeting kind of proves the hidden agenda.

Anyone who is 'in' education knows that local councils use schools (and other front-line public services controlled by the local council) as political footballs and will use every opportunity to manipulate local 'democratic' powers to denigrate the government's policies, when central government is conservative and local government is not as we all saw during the Thatcher years.

During the 1990s I worked in several different types of schools in Southwark, Lambeth and Lewisham- all of them seemed to have enough resources at the 'chalkface' - City Technology Colleges, Grant Maintained and Voluntary Aided faith schools but the locally managed schools- i.e. the ones in local Authority control- did not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The frightening thing is that now and in the immediate future, funding for the education of our children in all schools and colleges is being cut - whether they are local authority maintained schools, sixth form colleges, academies. This is my concern as a parent of children just starting their education.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...