Jump to content

Were you in the first "Old Charter" cohort in 2000?


Recommended Posts

Were you - or was somebody you know - in the first cohort that went to the Charter School back in September 2000? I'd love to hear what it was like being the pioneering group at the school: was it an adventure, or did you feel like a guinea pig? Was there a clear vision, or did you feel you were making things up as you went along? Do you think it was a benefit or a drawback not having older year groups through your secondary years (compared with your peers in other schools)?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, that's why I want to hear from somebody who actually lived through it. Do the class of 2000 look back and think 'that was great'?


Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have thought that as an 11/12 year old

> they didn't see it that way i.e. a pioneering

> group.

>

> It's bad enough starting secondary school let

> alone thinking about what goes on in the years

> above!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing at 25/26 there might not be many of the first cohort checking the family discussion threads on the East Dulwich forum?


However last year, when applying to schools, we met someone, by chance, who was part of The Charter School founding cohort, and it was very reassuring to speak to her about her experience. In summary, she was utterly positive about her initial school year and subsequent progress through the growing school.


I wonder if you might have more luck putting the question on the general discussion board, as perhaps parents of that cohort are no longer checking the 'family discussion' pages but are still using the forum elsewhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking the same thing. 20 somethings who grew up here are unlikely to be on the family room forum. They probably don't even live around here anymore. Given their parents don't have young children either, the main section or lounge might be a better bet to find someone with direct experience.


eleni70 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm guessing at 25/26 there might not be many of

> the first cohort checking the family discussion

> threads on the East Dulwich forum?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anyone who was part of the Old Charter Cohort - but I was recently talking to someone at a charity I'm doing some work for and explaining about my son's school (Charter ED) and him being in the founding cohort. And she got very excited and said she had been in the founding cohort of her secondary school - somewhere outside London. She said it was great, they loved it - they had a real sense of ownership and belonging and they loved being the oldest children as the school grew and she felt it gave her a sense of confidence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if perhaps the kids won't be aware necessarily of the negatives of the situation. For example, not having older kids around doing work beyond your level that you can aspire to. And teachers having 3 years of non-exam syllabus teaching and the effects that may have. I don't know how strong those aspects (and others like them) may be and whether they're offset by others. But I'm not sure that as a pupil you can really assess them if you know nothing different (and if the school constantly pushes the message on the positives!).


I think all the schools will have pros and cons and they may even differ for different types of kids. It's so hard to truly work out which will be the 'best' option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...