Jump to content

which cereals do you give and at what age?


Recommended Posts

My 16 month went off porridge at breakfast ages ago and has been having toast for months, but doesn't want to eat toast at the moment (possibly related to her father having introduced her to the concept of shreddies!)

I gave her shreddies this morning and have possibly never seen her so excited, but was just wondering at what age others started giving cereals and which ones? Shreddies, cheerios etc?

The ones that are desirable to a toddler like shreddies are all packed with sugar and salt aren't they? But I can't imagine her greeting a bran flake with the same enthusiasm as met the shreddies!!

Is 16 months a bit early for the amount of sugar in cereals? (obviously I'm not putting sugar on top!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think cheerios have a lot of sugar in - as do 90% of breakfast cereals.I managed to keep my eldest son on porridge but my youngest son had every sugar cereal possible as he was never hungry in the morning and I tried everything.

BRan flakes- if I can't eat them I dont expect my children to - Fruit and fibre is nicer but I suspect its full of sugar too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they are still in nappies keep them off bran. My 2 year old loves bran, we have had to ban the bran! If he is lucky we will sprinkle a few flakes on top of another cereal to keep him happy. All the bran passes through their system undigested and sticks to their bum when you try and wipe it, really difficult to clean.


I always thought regular plain crispies, cornflakes and weetabix were all ok. Full size weetabix is ok, the milk makes it soggy and they can break it up, I think the mini ones aimed at children are loaded with sugar. Made that mistake with some mini weetabix once, they were ridiculously sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 3 year old son demands shreddies (original) almost every day, I put a dollop of apple puree on top and he loves it. I caught him feeding a soggy shreddie to my 12 month old and she too loves them. I also feed them Weetabix again with apple puree on top, my dtr has this almost every day. Porridge is a hit too as long as the apple puree is added!


I always thought full size Weetabix and Shreddies were low in salt and sugar but I could have it all wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughter has had weetabix since about 1 - adult size - and she often likes having raisins with it which helps 'sweeten' it I guess. We had the min-bix on holiday last week and agree - they don;'t need any sugar so my assumption was they are loaded with it already!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've given our little one normal weetabix and ready brek from around 6 months. Sometimes we add pureed fruit to the ready brek. My other half has some professional expertise in this area so I'll ask him about others - I know he's told me in the past that some of the stuff you'd think is fine is actually terrible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always weetabix here as mine went off porridge like yours. She sometimes has it warmed a bit, occasionally with a blueberry or two floating around. At nursery I think they give rice krispies sometimes as well but usully stick to weetabix.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything in moderation, I reckon. DD (19 months) has been on Weetabix with stewed fruit since about 9 months, but recently we alternate it with Shreddies, both of which she loves. Then toasted muffins with butter and smidge of jam before we got out in the morning. Yum.


Thinking back, my Mum (who is a fab cook, super healthy eater etc etc) used to give us warm Ribena when we had woken up (as toddlers) then we had Frosties! We must have bounced out of the house on a sugar high!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2year old has a mixture, so half a weetabiz, handful of cheerios, handful of rice crispies. Ready brek always a favourite with mashed banana in.

Bran flakes are coated in sugar and honey! Mini shredded wheat with the fruit filling she likes too! I do read the ingredients on some of the cereals, strawberry flavoured sugar puffs, now what on earth is in them!!

At the moment we have crunchy bran, looks like cat food but she loves them.

I really found mixing the cereal much more exciting! And chopped fruit in too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of the cereal you think is ok is very sugary - rice crispies for eg


Only weetabix, porridge and shredded wheat are not high in sugar


But it's all a question of moderation I think and trying to discourage too sweet a tooth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With our daughter we stuck to mini shredded wheat till well over a year old then moved to weetabix which we haven with son now we are not quite so strict and are already mixing in weetabix at 7 months.


By the way on bran. I don't know about bran flakes but All Bran (the little sticks) are absolutely packed with sugar. I once used some in a cake recipe and checked the packet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great thing now is that it is easy to find the information on the package (look on the side for the information per 100g of cereal - then you just have to decide how much sugar is too much). Things like AllBran and Bran Flakes have LOADS of sugar added.


I remember being given FrootLoops as a child, only for my very strict mother to try them one day and be horrifed by how sweet they are!


For what it's worth, my 15m and 2yo have generic shreddies and cheerios from time to time, but not every day. I have even been known to buy the multipacks of sugary cereal to take on holidays with us... The rest of the time it is porrige or toast (no jam).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...