Jump to content

Has anyone used the Fish Needs Water estate agent?


EdgarRes

Recommended Posts

Hi Suze,


We've just sold our with Fish Need Water (exchanged on Friday!!).


We were passed on their details as a recommendation, and I would genuinely endorse them to other folk too.


They are quick to respond, have a personality - and are a lot cheaper than traditional agencies.

We are buying through a different agency, and the difference is very obvious and really frustrating!


Make sure you speak to James...he helped us.

If you want his contact details do shout.



Good luck with your move,

Lou x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lou, thanks very much and congratulations.

May I ask whether you were selling a house or flat? How long was the process from putting on the market and exchanging.

What was it that you particularly liked about this agency e.g. what did they do particularly well, like the marketing, keeping in touch, being quick to respond to your queries and concerns, etc.? And what were the shortfalls?

Were they the sole agent?

Did you use their premium service? If not, what was it like conducting all the viewings yourself?

These are just off the top of my head. If I have more over next couple of days may I PM you?

Many thanks again.

Suze

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...