Jump to content

Caution against Lordship Dry Cleaners


Rincam07

Recommended Posts

Some months ago I spilled curry on my alpaca wool jumper and had it dry cleaned by Lordship Dry Cleaners (9 Lordship Ln, East Dulwich, London SE22 8EW).


It was returned covered in curry and now with a hole on the front of the jumper. After not being pleased with the patching job they did on the hole, I asked for monetary compensation and was told that the jumper would be sent to an insurance company to be revised and reimbursed for before they could compensate for the item. This event followed 2 months of calling them every week, coming into the shop, and emailing them multiple times. They had my jumper and hadn't even given me my money back for the cleaning.


The clerk said time and time again that they were waiting for the insurance, that he could not give me the managers number because "he would yell at him" and would not give me any proof of this said insurance company. Finally one day he said it would arrive next Monday. When I showed up, a different man was there who gave me back my jumper. When I asked for my compensation he said that the original clerk had been lying to me, that there was no insurance company, and that the business would never compensate me for this. (Why he was honest is beyond me)


Bottom line: I payed 8 pounds to have my alpaca jumper broken, and returned covered in curry. The man in charge of the store lied to my face and wasted my time for 2 months instead of being upfront from the start. I would caution anyone from doing business with Lordship Dry Cleaners for their lack of professionalism and flat out dishonesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would someone go to the trouble of making up a story like that and posting it on here?


ETA: You could report them to the trading standards department of the council.


Or take them to the small claims court, if you could be bothered. If the case was found in your favour I think they would have to pay your costs.


Though they'd probably settle with you before it came to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't you spot clean the curry to remove as much as possible while it was still wet? Dried curry stains would have been very difficult to remove once dried - given the colourful spices (some of which are used to dye fabrics in their own right).


In any event, if the garment was returned with a hole in it the shop should have offered reimbursement of some kind.


Trading Standards via CAB consumer helpline might be the most straight-forward option now: [https://www.southwark.gov.uk/business/trading-standards-and-food-safety/consumer-advice/reporting-a-trading-standards-issue]


London Borough of Southwark

Trading Standards

Regulatory Services

Environment & Social Regeneration Division

3rd Floor Hub 1, PO Box 64529

London

SE1P 5LX



t: 020 75252000

f: 020 75255735

w: London Borough of Southwark Trading Standards website


Notes: Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 03454 04 05 06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...