Jump to content

The Dulwich estate ? modern day reverse Robin Hood ?


DadOf4

Recommended Posts

OK, first I accept that this isn?t strictly an EAST Dulwich subject ? but this seems the best place to discuss this.


At some point in the 17th Century, Edward Alleyn created a charitable foundation and bequeathed to it his estate and other property. The original benefices were ?12 poor scholars, six poor brothers and six poor sisters?. Roll forward a few hundred years and that organisation has now become the registered charity ?The Dulwich estate?. This charity owns the freehold of 1500 acres of prime South-East London and has a gross income (2013) of ?9.4M [3]


I?m a big believer in sport. I?m a big believer in making sport accessible to as many people (especially Children) as possible.

The Dulwich Estate is the landlord of many local sports clubs & facilities. Its my understanding that their approach to the velodrome a few years ago nearly caused it to close [1], I understand that the rents charged to many local sports facilities are hefty to say the least[2].

So, if you live in this area and your kid wants to play football, cricket or rugby, its likely that a % of the money you have to pay is going indirectly to The Dulwich Estate.

I also know that local state schools have to pay rent to use sports fields owned by the estate (indirectly via the clubs that have the leases)


But they?re a charity right ? ? they?ll take that income and redistribute it to the poor scholors and brothers?

Wrong

The Dulwich Estate gives 85% (yes eighty-five percent) of its generated income to 3 organisations: Dulwich College, Alleynians School and James Allens Girls school. All good schools I?m sure, all schools with fees of about ?15k per year, educating a privileged elite (yes, I know there are many ?normal people? round here who scrimp and save to get their kids into these schools ? but even they are a lucky few in the grand scheme of things)


Last year it gave over ?2M to Dulwich College [3]. That?s a school where Roman Abramovich sends his kid, that has a county standard cricket pitch.

Now, I?m sure that they?ll say the money is partly used to create bursaries for kids to attend these fine institutions who wouldn?t go otherwise.

It also gives relatively small amounts of money to a couple of state schools, the alms-houses in Dulwich and the chapel (near the park). But 85% goes to the 3 private schools

I?ve got no moral objection to private education and I?d be very happy for my kids to attend those schools - but what really bothers me is this:

a) How on earth can this organisation claim to be a charity? - what is ?in the public good? about giving money to organisations that provide education to a very small & select privileged few?

b) Specifically, this organisation IMO is taking money from sports clubs and giving it to these elite organisations. My kids go to a number of clubs in the area and I know the great works that many of them are doing (usually by volunteers) to make sport as accessible as possible to kids in Southwark.

I know one club that provides free membership to kids who otherwise wouldn?t be able to play their sport ? that same club made a loss last year. But they still have to keep shelling out to Dulwich estate.


I?d be interested to hear what others think of this.


[1]

http://www.urban75.org/london/velodrome1.html

[2] https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdsc.mycourts.co.uk%2Fnews_downloads%2F4062_Presidents_Report_2012.doc&ei=yOwfVJyoCsif7gaYyYDACw&usg=AFQjCNHrEgACLzmNipoFgNiatFSMGu-j-A&sig2=WW7WWfLnDePQD9gJPLhmSQ

[3]

http://www.dulwichestate.co.uk/accounts/the-dulwich-estate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DadOf4 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I know one club that provides free membership to

> kids who otherwise wouldn?t be able to play their

> sport ? that same club made a loss last year. But

> they still have to keep shelling out to Dulwich

> estate.


^ it is hard to argue with the perversity of this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, it doesn't surprise (or upset ) me to see somebody in the org earning ?130k. Its an organisation with ?9M turnover that will need running & management. Same applies to many charities.


I've no problem with the CEO of, say, Cancer Research UK earning good money if he/she can help the charity raise/give more money.


The problem with The Dulwich Estate is what they DO as a "charity"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The problem with The Dulwich Estate is what they DO as a "charity""


I agree, but I don't think that the two or disconnected. Cancer Research UK is a large organization with complex considerations around fund raising and distribution. The Dulwich Estate, as far as I can see, employees four people. Money flows in automatically by virtue of its legal position and distribution of funds largely involves slicing the pie into n chunks and handing it over to the local private schools. Perhaps dividing ?9,000,000 by n is marginally harder than dividing say ?9,000 by n. By only marginally...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the relevant question is why are the private schools charities. I'm sure it would find it more difficult to maintain its own charitable status if the ultimate beneficiaries were not also charities.


[edit: I don't have any data to support my assertion below that DC is unusual in providing 100% bursaries - it's just what I heard. For clarity, even if true, I don't think on its own that it's sufficient to establish that the schools "ought" to get charitable status]


I believe Dulwich College is one of the few private schools that gives (a very small number of) 100% bursaries for select local kids that could not otherwise even consider private education. The schemes of many schools are discounts of 10-50%, and the residual fees are still too high for most. I don't know exactly how DC assesses your financial position nor the rate at which the bursaries are reduced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DadOf4 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The problem with The Dulwich Estate is what they DO as a "charity"


Why? Because they don't help the people you see as 'fit and proper' targets for your largesse?


What are you asking for here? That Dulwich Estate be forced to stop funding things you disapprove of? That charitable status be removed from a school charity organisation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DadOf4 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > The problem with The Dulwich Estate is what they

> DO as a "charity"

>

> Why? Because they don't help the people you see

> as 'fit and proper' targets for your largesse?

>

> What are you asking for here? That Dulwich Estate

> be forced to stop funding things you disapprove

> of? That charitable status be removed from a

> school charity organisation?



I don't know - I'm not really "calling" for anything. Its just I was quite shocked by the fact that an organisation that *seems* to have digressed so far from its original aims should be doing so under the guise of a charity (and the tax benefits that follow) - I was keen to see if others thought the same.


The charity commission say "To be a charity in England or Wales, your organisation must be set up with purposes which are exclusively charitable for the public benefit."


IMO - raising rents on social facilities like sports fields and redistributing that money to a set of (already wealthy) schools is not really meeting that test.


Yes, theres nothing wrong with giving some kids a better education (as ive said before, I've got no objection to private education) and I dont want to get into a tit-for-tat about the best places for charity money to go (we all have our own views & priorities on that ) but it just doesnt sit right with me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

newboots Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understood that the number of 100% bursaries

> from Alleyns is very small now in comparison to

> the number available in 1960s and 70s?



Yes that's true but I don't think it's anything to do with the issue Dadof4 has raised. Alleyn's was a direct grant school back then so if a child met the school's academic criteria the fees were paid by the local authority. Direct grant schools were abolished in 1976 and later replaced by the Assisted Places Scheme in 1981. When the direct grant scheme was abolished schools had to choose whether to come fully into the state sector or go independent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DadOf4 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The charity commission say "To be a charity in England or Wales, your organisation must be set up

> with purposes which are exclusively charitable for the public benefit."


I have the same misgivings about animal charities - especially donkey sanctuaries. But, if people can be bothered setting one up and collecting money then who am I to say they shouldn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My own take on it is that I don't have a problem with people setting up a charity and asking people for money. But, Dulwich Estate residents are coerced into handing over money. That is not charitable behavior in my view. Not everyone that lives on the Dulwich Estate is fantastically wealthy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where is the coercion? DE own facilities and

> assets and raise rents on them as a form of

> income. It's hardly shaking children down for

> their lunch money on street corners, is it?


But is it charitable ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on the DE - bunch of robbers IMHO! A bit off thread however they have decided that our road needs extensive resurfacing works to the tune of just under 1 million quid ... that means each house on our little estate must cough up around ?10K per household (!) to put towards these unneccesary works!! They are completely out of touch with the 'common man' and the only way I'm getting 10K is by buying a balaclava...!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps unsurprisingly there is a boring and complicated legal answer to the question 'why is this considered a charity', largely arising from litigation involving independent schools and the Charity Commission in 2010-2011. The judgment is here:


http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2011/421.pdf


Pretty heavy going, even for lawyers, but the key finding was that assessing whether a trust was entitled to charitable status involves asking 'what was it set up to do?', not 'what is it actually doing now?'. Providing a general education has always been recognised as a charitable purpose, so unless the original trust document said 'education only for the rich' it's fine.


The relevance of what the school is actually doing is to whether it is fulfilling its charitable purpose, and on that score the court said it's up to the trustees in each case to make sure they do enough to meet the public benefit test.


Going back to the OP and sports clubs, one thing that is clear is that if you are an educational charity, doing non-educational 'good deeds' e.g. making your sports facilities available for free to local clubs is outside your charitable purposes and may be a breach of trust, which is a little ironic.


In an ideal world fee paying schools would aim to be 'needs blind' i.e. if you satisfy the entry requirements you get whatever financial aid is necessary for you to take up a place. The difficulty is that you either need to start with a massive endowment fund (a la Harvard) or it needs public money. If the Tories get re-elected, we might hear more about it though:


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d00408ba-e012-11e2-bf9d-00144feab7de.html#axzz3E21GfEpN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Plenty for sale online from various ticket vendors but you'll need to part with £250 and upwards by the looks of it. Out of interest i kept an eye on the prices for the England and Italy Euro final. At one point they were on offer for a couple of grand each. On the day sellers were obviously getting itchy feet and prices dropped somewhat but never went any lower than £400. That was a few hours before kick off. There was plenty still available half an hour before kick off.   Having been to Wembley a couple of times for play off finals i found it to be not a great place to watch football. Sat three rows back from the pitch side advertising hoardings for one game and way way up in the gods for the other. We felt to far away from the pitch on both occasions. Up in the goods was just stupid because we felt cut off as well.  I don't think it was rebuilt with acoustics in mind either. Even with most of our 25k fans singing it never sounded loud because it's pretty much uncovered and too open.   Happy hunting!
    • It doesn't work as a commercial venture.  Bit churlish to say I told you so.  I told you so.  I'll send less greetings cards.  What pees me off is international postage where you can no longer send light letters at 10 grammes, normal ones up to 20g, now all at the much more expensive 100 g  Didn't we vote to take back control and price everything according to irrational units like ounces? That's some obscure humour btw   
    • Available from Monday April 8th 2024, 2on2Walkies take pride in doggie care and only walk 2 furry friends at a time. I make sure that they get plenty of doggie interaction and socialisation in the park as well as making friends. Back home happy and tired I always check that the water bowl has fresh water and always make sure the doggie is left comfortable before I leave. I'm fully insured and have a couple of slots available for local walks to either Peckham Rye Park or Dulwich Park.  Thank you!  
    • Why would they only send them recorded delivery? I used the signed for option yesterday.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...